linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakob Oestergaard <jakob@unthought.net>
To: Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc@linuxweasel.com>
Cc: Vladimir Milovanovic <vlad@webmail.co.za>,
	linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Tiobench results LOWER with more threads
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 13:19:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021018111918.GC7875@unthought.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021018023137.GC18294@peeps.cable.rcn.com>

On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 07:31:37PM -0700, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 11:50:14PM +0200, Jakob Oestergaard wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 10:20:55AM +0200, Vladimir Milovanovic wrote:
> > > OK, just joined the list and rad the faq, and something caught my eye. 
> > > Tiobench results are apparently supposed to INCREASE when there are more 
> > > threads.
> > 
> > No, what gave you that idea?
> > 
> > It is so much easier for the kernel to handle one sequential stream of
> > I/O, instead of many streams.
> > 
> > If you have more than one stream, you need to seek. Seeking is bad. One
> > sequential I/O is almost always (with the notable exception of RAID-1
> > reads) faster in total sustained throughput, and always (as in really
> > always) faster in per-thread sustained throughput.
> 
> Err, so are you saying that a single sequential I/O is slower on RAID
> 1 when compared with a single disk?  That doesn't make a lot of
> sense.  There -are- instances where parallel I/O is required.  In
> these cases, any RAID-1 should be much faster than a single disk, as
> should RAID 10.  I'm not sure that RAID 5 should give a similar
> benefit, but given the cost of disks, I don't care about RAID 5.

The exception I made was:

"One sequential I/O is almost always (with the notable exception of
RAID-1 reads) faster in total sustained throughput,..."

What I wanted to say was: One sequential reader is usually faster than N
readers are in total.  Except on an N-disk RAID-1, where up to N readers
will be faster in total than one reader.

An N-disk RAID-1 will scale with up to N readers.

There's some fuzz on these measurements, because a sequential read on a
filesystem is not a sequential read on the disk (because of fs
metadata), so therefore often a single threaded read on an N-disk RAID-1
will be faster than on a single disk - and maybe RAID-1 will not scale
up to N readers, but only N-1, but that all depends on the fs - and
let's not go too deep into that for now  :)

-- 
................................................................
:   jakob@unthought.net   : And I see the elder races,         :
:.........................: putrid forms of man                :
:   Jakob Østergaard      : See him rise and claim the earth,  :
:        OZ9ABN           : his downfall is at hand.           :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

      parent reply	other threads:[~2002-10-18 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-15  8:20 Tiobench results LOWER with more threads Vladimir Milovanovic
2002-10-17 21:50 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-10-18  2:31   ` Gregory Leblanc
2002-10-18  2:52     ` Maurice Hilarius
2002-10-18  7:48     ` Vladimir Milovanovic
2002-10-18 11:19     ` Jakob Oestergaard [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021018111918.GC7875@unthought.net \
    --to=jakob@unthought.net \
    --cc=gleblanc@linuxweasel.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vlad@webmail.co.za \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).