linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakob Oestergaard <jakob@unthought.net>
To: raid@ddx.a2000.nu
Cc: Chris Siebenmann <cks@utcc.utoronto.ca>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is Read speed faster when 1 disk is failed on raid5 ?
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:45:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021022104522.GC24075@unthought.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210221154500.26127-100000@ddx.a2000.nu>

On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:58:56AM +0200, raid@ddx.a2000.nu wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> >  At a guess: when RAID-5 is intact, the kernel must read the entire
> > stripe size worth of data to verify the parity. When a RAID-5 array has
> > a dead disk, any intact data block can be handed to the application
> > the moment it comes off the disk as there is no point in doing parity
> > verification. (The kernel has to reconstruct the missing blocks, but
> > most of the blocks are present and good.)
> 
> i thought raid5 was doing parity calculation when writing ?

Correct. RAID-5 will not do parity calculation when reading. RAID-5 will
give you availability but it will not give you integrity.

> difference between rading from failed an intact raid5 is almost twice the
> speed (failed is doing 150MB/sec, intact is doing 80MB/sec)

I didn't follow the beginning of this thread, sorry.  Is this SCSI?

-- 
................................................................
:   jakob@unthought.net   : And I see the elder races,         :
:.........................: putrid forms of man                :
:   Jakob Østergaard      : See him rise and claim the earth,  :
:        OZ9ABN           : his downfall is at hand.           :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-22 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <02Oct22.043816edt.62658@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca>
2002-10-22  9:58 ` Is Read speed faster when 1 disk is failed on raid5 ? raid
2002-10-22 10:45   ` Jakob Oestergaard [this message]
2002-10-22 10:49     ` raid
2002-10-22 11:24       ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-10-28 18:27         ` Yiqiang Ding
2002-10-28 21:02           ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-10-28 21:37             ` Yiqiang Ding
2002-10-29  0:30               ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-10-29 21:05                 ` Yiqiang Ding
2002-10-31 11:56                   ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-10-10 21:18 3ware 7500-12, bad write speed raid
2002-10-17  8:19 ` Is Read speed faster when 1 disk is failed on raid5 ? raid
2002-10-17 11:52   ` raid

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021022104522.GC24075@unthought.net \
    --to=jakob@unthought.net \
    --cc=cks@utcc.utoronto.ca \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raid@ddx.a2000.nu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).