linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Corry <corryk@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Steven Dake <sdake@mvista.com>,
	Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC - new raid superblock layout for md driver
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 16:55:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021121215509.GJ14063@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02112114532304.06518@boiler>

On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:53:23PM -0600, Kevin Corry wrote:
> 
> LVM doesn't handle the filesystem resizing, the filesystem tools do. The only 
> thing you need is something in user-space to ensure the correct ordering. For 
> an expand, the MD device must be expanded first. When that is complete, 
> resizefs is called to expand the filesystem.
> 
> MD currently doesn't allow resize of RAID 0, 4 or 5, because expanding 
> striped devices is way ugly.

MD doesn't, raidreconf does but not online.

> If it was determined to be possible, the MD 
> driver may need additional support to allow online resize.

Yes, it would.  It's not impossible, just difficult.

> But it is just as 
> easy to add this support to MD rather than have to merge MD and DM.

Well, merging the two would actually be rather a simple task I think since 
you would still keep each md mode a separate module, the only difference 
might be some inter-communication call backs between LVM and MD, but even 
those aren't necessarily required.  The prime benefit I would see from 
making the two into one is being able to integrate all the disparate 
superblocks into a single superblock format that helps to avoid any 
possible startup errors between the different logical mapping levels.

-- 
  Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>     919-754-3700 x44233
         Red Hat, Inc. 
         1801 Varsity Dr.
         Raleigh, NC 27606
  

  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-21 21:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-20  4:09 RFC - new raid superblock layout for md driver Neil Brown
2002-11-20 10:03 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-11-20 23:02   ` Neil Brown
2002-11-22  0:08   ` Kenneth D. Merry
2002-12-09  3:52     ` Neil Brown
2002-12-09 23:50       ` large await discrepancies Joe Pruett
2002-12-10 15:59         ` Joe Pruett
2002-12-12 15:30           ` Joe Pruett
2002-12-10  6:28       ` RFC - new raid superblock layout for md driver Kenneth D. Merry
2002-12-11  0:07         ` Neil Brown
2002-11-20 13:58 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2002-11-20 23:17   ` Neil Brown
2002-11-20 14:09 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-20 23:11   ` Neil Brown
2002-11-21  0:30     ` Alan Cox
2002-11-21  0:10       ` John Adams
2002-11-21  0:30     ` Alan Cox
2002-11-20 16:03 ` Joel Becker
2002-11-20 23:31   ` Neil Brown
2002-11-21  1:46     ` Doug Ledford
2002-11-21 19:34       ` Joel Becker
2002-11-21 19:54         ` Doug Ledford
2002-11-21 19:57           ` Steven Dake
2002-11-21 20:38             ` Doug Ledford
2002-11-21 20:49               ` Steven Dake
2002-11-21 20:35                 ` Kevin Corry
2002-11-21 21:29             ` Alan Cox
2002-11-21 21:22               ` Doug Ledford
2002-11-21 20:53                 ` Kevin Corry
2002-11-21 21:55                   ` Doug Ledford [this message]
2002-11-21 23:49               ` DM vs MD (Was: RFC - new raid superblock layout for md driver) Luca Berra
2002-11-21 20:06           ` RFC - new raid superblock layout for md driver Joel Becker
2002-11-21 23:35           ` Luca Berra
2002-11-22 10:13   ` Joe Thornber
2002-12-02 21:38     ` Neil Brown
2002-12-03  8:24       ` Luca Berra
2002-11-20 17:05 ` Steven Dake
2002-11-20 23:30   ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-11-20 23:48   ` Neil Brown
2002-11-21  0:29     ` Steven Dake
2002-11-21 15:23       ` John Stoffel
2002-11-21 19:36   ` Joel Becker
2002-11-22  7:11 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-20 15:55 Steve Pratt
2002-11-20 23:24 ` Neil Brown
2002-11-20 23:47 Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-11-21  0:31 ` Neil Brown
2002-11-21  0:35 ` Steven Dake
2002-11-21  1:10   ` Alan Cox
2002-12-08 22:35   ` Neil Brown
2002-11-21 19:39 ` Joel Becker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021121215509.GJ14063@redhat.com \
    --to=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=Joel.Becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=corryk@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
    --cc=sdake@mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).