From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jure Pecar Subject: Re: What is the logic behind 'Device or resource busy' ? Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 04:56:39 +0200 Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20030527045639.1e74abcf.pegasus@telemach.net> References: <20030527015918.047bf247.pegasus@telemach.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.q2QC9TbTEfymPu" Return-path: In-Reply-To: To: Joe Pruett Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --=.q2QC9TbTEfymPu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 26 May 2003 17:39:45 -0700 (PDT) Joe Pruett wrote: > i don't know the mdadm equivalent, but i do raidhotremove followed by > raidhotadd to get around that issue. if you look at /proc/mdstat after > the failure, you'll probably see the drive is still part of the array, but > > just marked as down. raidhotremove tells the system it is gone and then > you can add it back. hm yes... a failed drive is still present and has to be removed. makes sense now, thanks. -- Jure Pecar --=.q2QC9TbTEfymPu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+0tPpOHUMrcOSg+8RAltoAKC6PChq3hoj0kyHNrBMx4L+tWauHwCgp4xs UB4+I6GmlXMhEwbTILyj0Es= =KvYb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.q2QC9TbTEfymPu--