From: "raidlist" <raidlist@area151.com>
To: mjstumpf@pobox.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Power Saving possible ? (fwd)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 10:03:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200308270803.h7R83KNl001925@mail.explainerdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0308262319350.14568@ddx.a2000.nu>
Hi,
I saw your msg but, sorry, this is not the answer.
What if you have 5 machines with 14 drives each, than this can be higher
(it also depends on the energy costs your local company charges you).
And less noise and less heat is also important for me, so ?
Would anyone have another suggestion ?
(Even if had to unmount the raid to put the drives to sleep, in a script os
something, would already help, although it's not ideal...But I don't know if
this is possible with the drives connected to the 3Ware.)
Thanks a lot again.
Marcello
> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 11:39:59 -0400 (EDT)
> From: mjstumpf <mjstumpf@cotse.net>
> Reply-To: mjstumpf@pobox.com
> To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Power Saving possible ?
>
> > Hi,
> > I have a server that is rarely accessed, but I would like it to be
> > available always.
>
> I just asked this question 1 day ago.
>
> The short answer was: why bother, drives only chew up 10
> watts, so it is
> far more expensive in the long term to do it (as well as technically
> complicated).
>
> BTW, thanks all, I didnt realize idle power consumption was so low.
>
> Read the archives for full story..
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-27 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0308262319350.14568@ddx.a2000.nu>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200308270803.h7R83KNl001925@mail.explainerdc.com \
--to=raidlist@area151.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjstumpf@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).