From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree Subject: Re: RAID1 VS RAID5 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:17:15 +0100 Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20031027141715.GJ13640@marowsky-bree.de> References: <1067179519.1222.107.camel@cala> <200310270933.37564.dusty@strike.wu-wien.ac.at> <200310271201.10418.dusty@strike.wu-wien.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200310271201.10418.dusty@strike.wu-wien.ac.at> To: Hermann Himmelbauer , Gordon Henderson , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 2003-10-27T12:01:10, Hermann Himmelbauer said: =46or reads, raid5 or not should not actually matter much, at least not negatively. The performance impact hits on write. Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Br=E9e --=20 High Availability & Clustering \ ever tried. ever failed. no matt= er. SUSE Labs | try again. fail again. fail better. Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG \ -- Samuel Beckett - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html