linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rev. Jeffrey Paul" <sneak@datavibe.net>
To: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@duke.edu>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3ware escalade vs software raid, from a different jeff
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:56:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040219175630.GA20790@datavibe.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402190704420.25541@chaos.egr.duke.edu>

On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 07:06:32AM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>
> I fully agree on avoiding cheap "hardware" RAID cards.  Regarding drivers 
> going away, though, the 3ware drivers are open source and have been in the 
> kernel for a long time.  If 3ware were to disappear (unlikely), I'd be 
> willing to bet that the drivers stay supported by the community.
> 

I have always avoided the promise fasttrak cards for exactly that 
reason ("hardware" being in quotes).  It's my understanding that 
they're not much more than their udma cards with drivers that do most 
of the RAIDing.

It was also my understanding that the 3ware cards are true hardware 
raid and are up to the task of something like this, which would also 
explain why they're 4x the cost.

I am looking at a four disk raid5 or raid10, and it seems like 
the interrupt load from four drives on four channels might be a bit 
excesive.  I'm going to be running critical services on the machine 
that the drives are in (namely mysql and nfs) and don't want to worry 
about performance.

Am I thinking about this the wrong way?

-j

--
--------------------------------------------------------
 Rev. Jeffrey Paul    -datavibe-     sneak@datavibe.net
   aim:x736e65616b   pgp:0x15FA257E   phone:8777483467
    70E0 B896 D5F3 8BF4 4BEE 2CCF EF2F BA28 15FA 257E
--------------------------------------------------------

  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-19 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-18 21:48 3ware escalade vs software raid, from a different jeff Rev. Jeffrey Paul
2004-02-18 22:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-19 11:49 ` Holger Kiehl
2004-02-19 12:06   ` Joshua Baker-LePain
2004-02-19 17:56     ` Rev. Jeffrey Paul [this message]
2004-02-19 19:58       ` Michael
2004-02-19 20:18         ` Ricky Beam
2004-02-19 22:04           ` Scsi adapters and software raid Bob Hillegas
2004-02-20  0:33             ` Kanoa Withington
2004-02-20  4:27             ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-19 22:33           ` 3ware escalade vs software raid, from a different jeff Scott Long
2004-02-19 23:52             ` Guy
2004-02-19 22:29         ` Scott Long
2004-02-20  4:26         ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-20  4:40           ` Scott Long
2004-02-20  0:38       ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-20  7:19         ` Joshua Baker-LePain
2004-02-19 12:11   ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-19 12:32     ` Holger Kiehl
2004-02-19 12:32     ` Jeff Garzik
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-23 22:23 Jeff Gray
2004-02-24  8:06 ` Holger Kiehl
2004-02-24 14:16 ` Joshua Baker-LePain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040219175630.GA20790@datavibe.net \
    --to=sneak@datavibe.net \
    --cc=jlb17@duke.edu \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).