From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: KELEMEN Peter Subject: Re: Which raid card to buy for Sarge Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 13:16:26 +0200 Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040409111626.GC3257@chihiro.cern.ch> References: <406B27E4.1000106@sauce.co.nz> <20040401090731.GI6923@chihiro.cern.ch> <406F936C.2090605@sauce.co.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <406F936C.2090605@sauce.co.nz> To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids * Richard Scobie (richard@sauce.co.nz) [20040404 16:47]: > KELEMEN Peter wrote: > > * Richard Scobie (richard@sauce.co.nz) [20040401 08:19]: > > >3ware hardware RAID 10: Reads - 92.8MB/s Writes - 88.9MB/s > > >Software RAID 10: Reads - 53.7MB/s Writes - 94.9 MB/s > > 3ware HW-RAID1, Linux SW-RAID0: read 263 MiB/s, write 157 MiB/s > > 3ware HW-RAID5, Linux SW-RAID0: read 243 MiB/s, write 135 MiB/s > > Linux SW-RAID5: read 225 MiB/s, write 135 MiB/s > > 3ware HW-RAID10: read 119 MiB/s, write 91 MiB/s > This array is obviously larger than the 4 disc one I have. Unfortunat= ely=20 > you do not have the one result I would really like - SW-RAID10. > It would be interesting to see how it compares to 3ware HW-RAID10. Well, I did those tests as well for the sake of interest. Linux SW-RAID10: read 221 MiB/s, write 105 MiB/s Peter --=20 .+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+'= ' Kelemen P=E9ter / \ / \ Peter.Kelemen@cern.c= h =2E+' `+...+' `+...+' `+...+' `+...+' - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html