From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree Subject: Re: Bug in multipath code (Linux 2.6.x) ? Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:04:17 +0200 Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040413080417.GG5271@marowsky-bree.de> References: <16500.33435.140991.667064@cse.unsw.edu.au> <200404101011.58547.dominik.kubla@uni-mainz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200404101011.58547.dominik.kubla@uni-mainz.de> To: Dominik Kubla , Neil Brown Cc: Dominik Kubla , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, khoddam@netz.klinik.uni-mainz.de List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 2004-04-10T10:11:58, Dominik Kubla said: > Understandable. Maybe the Linux SAN-Alliance should sponsor you a cou= ple of=20 > HBAs and a JBOD... ;-) A lot of work has gone into the Device-Mapper multipath target in 2.6; maybe you should look at that one. Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Br=E9e --=20 High Availability & Clustering \ ever tried. ever failed. no matt= er. SUSE Labs | try again. fail again. fail better. Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG \ -- Samuel Beckett - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html