From: maarten van den Berg <maarten@vbvb.nl>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hard drive Reliability?
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 01:44:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200405200144.31418.maarten@vbvb.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40ABD186.5030905@atella.com>
On Wednesday 19 May 2004 23:28, Sevatio wrote:
> Måns Rullgård wrote:
> > John Lange <john.lange@bighostbox.com> writes:
> > I'd agree that drives are not as good as they used to be. I recently
> > had a one year old Western Digital disk suddenly drop dead while
> > running. Nothing could be recovered from it. Shortly after that I
> > bought four Seagate Barracuda ATA disks, one of which was defective.
> > It would work flawlessly for an hour to a month, then shut itself
> > down. Rebooting made it run for a while before it repeated.
> >
> > Compare this to the 1GB Quantum Fireball SCSI disk sitting in my
> > firewall. It's been running 24/7 since some time around 1996.
> >
> >>Does anyone know of any web sites with statistics or test data?
> >
> > That would be interesting.
>
> I would also concur. I had a Western Digital that failed after 10
> months. Western Digital sent me another one that failed in exactly 10
> months again. I didn't want to send it in to get yet another piece of
> WD junk. So, lesson learned to stay away form WD drives; correct or not.
<aol mode> Me too ! </aol mode>
My current vendor gives me a hard time everytime I order a new drive since
they sell WD predominantly. I still do not give in, no WD for me anymore.
Maarten
--
Yes of course I'm sure it's the red cable. I guarante[^%!/+)F#0c|'NO CARRIER
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-19 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-19 19:58 Hard drive Reliability? John Lange
2004-05-19 20:49 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-05-19 21:28 ` Sevatio
2004-05-19 22:02 ` John Lange
2004-05-19 22:42 ` jim
2004-05-19 22:26 ` Guy
2004-05-19 23:53 ` maarten van den Berg
2004-05-20 0:49 ` TJ Harrell
2004-05-20 1:13 ` berk walker
2004-05-20 6:39 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-05-19 23:44 ` maarten van den Berg [this message]
2004-05-19 22:04 ` berk walker
2004-05-19 22:18 ` Guy
2004-05-19 23:40 ` maarten van den Berg
2004-05-20 0:34 ` Guy
2004-05-20 1:46 ` John Lange
2004-05-20 22:27 ` Russ Price
2004-05-20 15:51 ` Sevatio
2004-05-20 4:39 ` Mark Hahn
2004-05-20 7:15 ` John Lange
2004-05-20 12:15 ` Mark Hahn
2004-05-20 13:26 ` jim
2004-05-20 13:31 ` John Lange
2004-05-20 14:20 ` Mark Hahn
2004-05-20 13:32 ` Tim Grant
2004-05-20 14:38 ` Robin Bowes
2004-05-22 5:15 ` Brad Campbell
2004-05-24 13:25 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2004-05-24 18:35 ` Brad Campbell
2004-05-24 22:38 ` maarten van den Berg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-20 13:54 Cress, Andrew R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200405200144.31418.maarten@vbvb.nl \
--to=maarten@vbvb.nl \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).