From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree Subject: Re: SuSE Linux cluster using MC/ServiceGuard --- shared storage Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 20:33:18 +0200 Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040920183318.GP3592@marowsky-bree.de> References: <20040920132846.29970.qmail@web61108.mail.yahoo.com> <20040920135549.GA8201@percy.comedia.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040920135549.GA8201@percy.comedia.it> To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 2004-09-20T15:55:51, Luca Berra said: > >Do I still need to use the Driver Patch for EVA > >Controller Failover?=20 > i believe using the qlogic driver failover is a viable solutio, The DM multipath in 2.6 should handle the EVA just fine. The qlogic internal failover is being depreciated and AFAIK isn't included in 2.6 mainline even... > another is purchasing securepath from HP. but i believe there were > issues using securepath and lvm together. Proprietary multipathing solutions are a thing of the past on Linux, on= e hopes. Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Br=E9e --=20 High Availability & Clustering SUSE Labs, Research and Development SUSE LINUX AG - A Novell company - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html