From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree Subject: Re: SuSE Linux cluster using MC/ServiceGuard --- shared storage Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:33:01 +0200 Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040921153301.GF4118@marowsky-bree.de> References: <1C4766A743ADF74FAEDF2AAD0679BAA2036B97B2@cacexc03.americas.cpqcorp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1C4766A743ADF74FAEDF2AAD0679BAA2036B97B2@cacexc03.americas.cpqcorp.net> To: "Stern, Rick (Serviceguard Linux)" , Luca Berra , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 2004-09-21T06:40:43, "Stern, Rick (Serviceguard Linux)" said: > It is my understanding that MD/DM does not have the specific commands= to > support controller failover in the EVA. =20 I thought for the EVA none was needed, just that the overhead associate= d with switching was too high and thus one should only stick to the preferred path until it failed? (ie, no load-balancing at all.) Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Br=E9e --=20 High Availability & Clustering SUSE Labs, Research and Development SUSE LINUX AG - A Novell company - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html