From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luca Berra Subject: Re: raid 0+1 and 1+0 with mdadm Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:55:28 +0200 Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20041001205528.GC31475@percy.comedia.it> References: <1096566962.3539.15.camel@rich> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1096566962.3539.15.camel@rich> To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 10:56:03AM -0700, rich turner wrote: >when I run "mdadm -As" i get the following output: >mdadm: /dev/md3 has been started with 3 drives. >mdadm: /dev/md4 has been started with 3 drives. >mdadm: /dev/md6 has been started with 2 drives and 1 spare. >mdadm: /dev/md7 has been started with 2 drives and 1 spare. >mdadm: no devices found for /dev/md5 >mdadm: no devices found for /dev/md8 > >if i then immediately run "mdadm -As" again it starts /dev/md5 and >/dev/md8. > >why do i have to run it twice and why does it not start all devices the >first time? > i believe the device line is evaluated first, then all array lines processed. L. -- Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it Communication Media & Services S.r.l. /"\ \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN X AGAINST HTML MAIL / \