From: KELEMEN Peter <Peter.Kelemen@cern.ch>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3Ware 7506-8, anyone have any luck? I don't...
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:44:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041015184410.GC3035@inara.maison.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1097864507.13828.70.camel@tinny.home.foo>
[ Please do not address answers directly to me; I read the list. ]
* Scott T. Smith (scott@gelatinous.com) [20041015 11:21]:
> You know what, I think I was wrong -- we have the 8506. Sorry,
> my bad. And ours is SATA, not PATA (is that the difference
> between the 7xxx and 8xxx?)
Yes.
> There are other reasons the Highpoint is better than the 3ware,
> including the fact that it instantly recognizes when you yank a
> disk, unlike the 3ware which sits there for a while, and then
> hard resets the entire controller (thus halting all disk io to
> that controller for a couple of seconds). 3ware wrote me back
> and told me it's supposed to do that!
Cannot comment on this one, never was a problem for us.
> Is the 9500 a PCI-X card?
No, it's 64-bit 66 MHz PCI.
http://www.3ware.com/products/pdf/9000DS_041904.pdf
> [...] and we get the same crappy performance from that one too.
Define `crappy': I get 770 MiB/s read with 3x 3ware 9500S-8MI.
(RAID00 hw-sw)
> Worse yet, the 9xxx series wants to hijack your disks unless you
> go out of your way to enable 'export JBOD' mode. You can't take
> a disk from a 9xxx controller and put it in a box with an 8506
> -- the controller won't recognize it!
Have you tried zapping the first and the last megabyte of the
disk?
> BTW I'm not talking about RAID or filesystem performance, I'm
> talking about direct disk access, JBOD mode, using rather large
> blocks.
Direct disk access gives me nominal disk throughput on 3ware.
> So really all I want is multiple controllers on a single card.
> To that end, the 1820a works great. I figure we'd all be
> running software RAID anyways ;-)
As I said, attractive pricing. Cannot get stellar hardware RAID
performance with crappy chipsets. :-) There's a turnover point
where you are killed by PCI bandwith limit when using a lot of
disks.
Peter
--
.+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+''
Kelemen Péter / \ / \ Peter.Kelemen@cern.ch
.+' `+...+' `+...+' `+...+' `+...+'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-15 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-15 13:23 Slow software RAID5 linux-raid2eran
2004-10-15 17:27 ` 3Ware 7506-8, anyone have any luck? I don't buggz
2004-10-15 17:40 ` Scott T. Smith
2004-10-15 18:12 ` KELEMEN Peter
2004-10-15 18:21 ` Scott T. Smith
2004-10-15 18:44 ` KELEMEN Peter [this message]
2004-10-15 18:55 ` Scott T. Smith
2004-10-15 19:28 ` KELEMEN Peter
2004-10-15 19:19 ` Ming Zhang
2004-10-16 21:37 ` KELEMEN Peter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041015184410.GC3035@inara.maison.net \
--to=peter.kelemen@cern.ch \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).