From: TJ <systemloc@earthlink.net>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Looking for the cause of poor I/O performance
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 02:12:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200412030212.38288.systemloc@earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200412021138.17311.systemloc@earthlink.net>
Here's some info on the VIA chipset problem..
Here's the article that really cracked the VIA chipset problem. It seems there
are problems with the default timings and latency settings:
http://www.tecchannel.de/hardware/817/8.html
This guy, independant of VIA, came up with some chipset register tweaks to
improve performance of the PCI bus for the broken VIAs.
http://www.georgebreese.com/net/software/
http://www.georgebreese.com/net/software/readmes/vlatency_v020b21_readme.HTM
http://adsl.cutw.net/dlink-dsl200-via.html
The linux kernel sources indicate a problem with VIA chipsets too, but the
author doesn't have it fixed to his satisfaction, obviously.
From linux-2.6.7/drivers/pci/quirks.c:
/* The VIA VP2/VP3/MVP3 seem to have some 'features'. There may be a
workaround
but VIA don't answer queries. If you happen to have good contacts at VIA
ask them for me please -- Alan
This appears to be BIOS not version dependent. So presumably there is a
chipset level fix */
I'm wondering if I could get the tweaks that George Breese has made and
implement them in linux. If I could, how would I benchmark to check for
improvement? Bonnie? hdparm -tT? Some PCI benchmark?
TJ Harrell
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-03 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-02 16:38 Looking for the cause of poor I/O performance TJ
2004-12-03 0:49 ` Mark Hahn
2004-12-03 3:54 ` Guy
2004-12-03 6:33 ` TJ
2004-12-03 7:38 ` Guy
2004-12-04 15:23 ` TJ
2004-12-04 17:59 ` Guy
2004-12-04 23:51 ` Mark Hahn
2004-12-05 1:00 ` Steven Ihde
2004-12-06 17:48 ` Steven Ihde
2004-12-06 19:29 ` Guy
2004-12-06 21:10 ` David Greaves
2004-12-06 23:02 ` Guy
2004-12-08 9:24 ` David Greaves
2004-12-08 18:31 ` Guy
2004-12-08 22:00 ` Steven Ihde
2004-12-08 22:25 ` Guy
2004-12-08 22:41 ` Guy
2004-12-09 1:40 ` Steven Ihde
2004-12-12 8:56 ` Looking for the cause of poor I/O performance - a test script David Greaves
2004-12-28 0:13 ` Steven Ihde
2004-12-06 21:16 ` Looking for the cause of poor I/O performance Steven Ihde
2004-12-06 21:42 ` documentation of /sys/vm/max-readahead Morten Sylvest Olsen
2004-12-05 2:16 ` Looking for the cause of poor I/O performance Guy
2004-12-05 15:14 ` TJ
2004-12-06 21:39 ` Mark Hahn
2004-12-05 15:17 ` TJ
2004-12-06 21:34 ` Mark Hahn
2004-12-06 23:06 ` Guy
2004-12-03 6:51 ` TJ
2004-12-03 20:03 ` TJ
2004-12-04 22:59 ` Mark Hahn
2004-12-03 7:12 ` TJ [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-03 11:30 TJ
2004-12-03 11:46 ` Erik Mouw
2004-12-03 15:09 ` TJ
2004-12-03 16:25 ` Erik Mouw
2004-12-03 16:32 ` David Greaves
2004-12-03 16:50 ` Guy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200412030212.38288.systemloc@earthlink.net \
--to=systemloc@earthlink.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).