From: Morten Sylvest Olsen <mso@medical-insight.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: documentation of /sys/vm/max-readahead
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:42:06 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041206222336.B61850@arsenium.medical-insight.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041206211607.GA3037@hamachi.dyndns.org>
Hi list.
Am I the first to battle performance related issues from the setting of
/proc/sys/vm/max-readahead? It seems there is quite a few threads floating
around the net related to performance of the md driver with external disks
connected over FC.
But I was pretty confused because /proc/mdstat reports the bogus old
device read_ahead value, and the md driver silently (well, not really)
uses /sys/vm/max-readahead to calculate a window size which makes quite a
difference in my setup where I have some scsi disks on a relatively
high-latency SAN. Possibly this issue only shows itself when running
RAID-1 where the chunksize is not used (there seem to be a bug in Jacob's
howto in section 5.10 on that point)
Maybe the issue only arises on RedHat because they for some reason chose
to make the 31 default value of /proc/sys/vm/max-readahead in their EL3
release, where the older default of 127 is more resonable?
I don't mind writing the blurb myself, if I'm not totally off course in my
error diagnostics.
-- Morten
--
Morten Sylvest Olsen, System Developer
Medical Insight A/S, Hovedgaden 451 C,2640 Hedehusene, Denmark
Phone:+4546550444, Mobile:+4551573092,Mail: mso@medical-insight.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-06 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-02 16:38 Looking for the cause of poor I/O performance TJ
2004-12-03 0:49 ` Mark Hahn
2004-12-03 3:54 ` Guy
2004-12-03 6:33 ` TJ
2004-12-03 7:38 ` Guy
2004-12-04 15:23 ` TJ
2004-12-04 17:59 ` Guy
2004-12-04 23:51 ` Mark Hahn
2004-12-05 1:00 ` Steven Ihde
2004-12-06 17:48 ` Steven Ihde
2004-12-06 19:29 ` Guy
2004-12-06 21:10 ` David Greaves
2004-12-06 23:02 ` Guy
2004-12-08 9:24 ` David Greaves
2004-12-08 18:31 ` Guy
2004-12-08 22:00 ` Steven Ihde
2004-12-08 22:25 ` Guy
2004-12-08 22:41 ` Guy
2004-12-09 1:40 ` Steven Ihde
2004-12-12 8:56 ` Looking for the cause of poor I/O performance - a test script David Greaves
2004-12-28 0:13 ` Steven Ihde
2004-12-06 21:16 ` Looking for the cause of poor I/O performance Steven Ihde
2004-12-06 21:42 ` Morten Sylvest Olsen [this message]
2004-12-05 2:16 ` Guy
2004-12-05 15:14 ` TJ
2004-12-06 21:39 ` Mark Hahn
2004-12-05 15:17 ` TJ
2004-12-06 21:34 ` Mark Hahn
2004-12-06 23:06 ` Guy
2004-12-03 6:51 ` TJ
2004-12-03 20:03 ` TJ
2004-12-04 22:59 ` Mark Hahn
2004-12-03 7:12 ` TJ
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041206222336.B61850@arsenium.medical-insight.com \
--to=mso@medical-insight.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).