From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Smith Subject: ext3 journal on software raid (was Re: PROBLEM: Kernel 2.6.10 crashing repeatedly and hard) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:42:40 +0000 Message-ID: <20050102194240.GE99565@caffreys.strugglers.net> References: <41D45C1F.5030307@tls.msk.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="p0aHTXLXY/BobAxh" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --p0aHTXLXY/BobAxh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 10:39:42PM +0100, Peter T. Breuer wrote: > In gmane.linux.raid Michael Tokarev wrote: > > Peter T. Breuer wrote: > > > In gmane.linux.raid Georg C. F. Greve wrote: > > >=20 > > > Yes, well, don't put the journal on the raid partition. Put it > > > elsewhere (anyway, journalling and raid do not mix, as write ordering > > > is not - deliberately - preserved in raid, as far as I can tell). > >=20 > > This is a sort of a nonsense, really. Both claims, it seems. >=20 > It's perfectly correct, as far as I know! Not really wishing to get into the middle of a flame war, but I didn't really see how this could be true so I asked for more info on ext3-users. I got the following response: https://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/2005-January/msg00003.html --p0aHTXLXY/BobAxh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB2E6wIJm2TL8VSQsRAlxiAKCLo9EJYQIe1VVa35KbnmWzPvuTfwCfRKy5 yLI4cQc/9zKYSnn8rpT2i5o= =qzkw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --p0aHTXLXY/BobAxh--