From: Maarten <maarten@ultratux.net>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Which drive gets read in case of inconsistency? [was: ext3 journal on software raid etc]
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:22:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200501041522.37374.maarten@ultratux.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7nfqa2-3qg.ln1@news.it.uc3m.es>
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 13:44, Peter T. Breuer wrote:
> Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> wrote:
Hm, Peter, you did it again. At the very end of an admittedly interesting
discussion you come out with the baseless assumptions and conclusions.
Just when I was prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt...
>
> Anyway, strictly speaking, the answer to your question is "yes". It
> does not decrease the probability, and therefore it increases it. The
> question is by how much, and that is unanswerable.
You continue to amaze me. If it does not decrease, it automatically
increases ?? What happened to the "stays equal" possibility ?
Do you exclusively use ">" and "<" instead of "=" in your math too ?
Maybe the increase is zero. Oh wait, it could even be negative, right ? Just
as with probability. So it possibly has an increase of, say, -0.5 ?
(see how easy it is to confuse people ?)
Maarten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-04 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200501030916.j039Gqe23568@inv.it.uc3m.es>
2005-01-03 10:17 ` ext3 journal on software raid (was Re: PROBLEM: Kernel 2.6.10 crashing repeatedly and hard) Guy
2005-01-03 11:31 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-03 17:34 ` Guy
2005-01-03 19:20 ` ext3 Gordon Henderson
2005-01-03 19:47 ` ext3 Morten Sylvest Olsen
2005-01-03 20:05 ` ext3 Gordon Henderson
2005-01-03 17:46 ` ext3 journal on software raid (was Re: PROBLEM: Kernel 2.6.10 crashing repeatedly and hard) maarten
2005-01-03 19:52 ` maarten
2005-01-03 20:41 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-03 23:19 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-03 23:46 ` Neil Brown
2005-01-04 0:28 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 1:18 ` Alvin Oga
2005-01-04 4:29 ` Neil Brown
2005-01-04 8:43 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 2:07 ` Neil Brown
2005-01-04 2:16 ` Ewan Grantham
2005-01-04 2:22 ` Neil Brown
2005-01-04 2:41 ` Andy Smith
2005-01-04 3:42 ` Neil Brown
2005-01-04 9:50 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 14:15 ` David Greaves
2005-01-04 15:20 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 16:42 ` Guy
2005-01-04 17:46 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 9:30 ` Maarten
2005-01-04 10:18 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 13:36 ` Maarten
2005-01-04 14:13 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 19:22 ` maarten
2005-01-04 20:05 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 21:38 ` Guy
2005-01-04 23:53 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-05 0:58 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2005-01-04 21:48 ` maarten
2005-01-04 23:14 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-05 1:53 ` maarten
2005-01-04 9:46 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 19:02 ` maarten
2005-01-04 19:12 ` David Greaves
2005-01-04 21:08 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 22:02 ` Brad Campbell
2005-01-04 23:20 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-05 5:44 ` Brad Campbell
2005-01-05 9:00 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-05 9:14 ` Brad Campbell
2005-01-05 9:28 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-05 9:43 ` Brad Campbell
2005-01-05 15:09 ` Guy
2005-01-05 15:52 ` maarten
2005-01-05 10:04 ` Andy Smith
2005-01-04 22:21 ` Neil Brown
2005-01-05 0:08 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 22:29 ` Neil Brown
2005-01-05 0:19 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-05 1:19 ` Jure Pe_ar
2005-01-05 2:29 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-05 0:38 ` maarten
2005-01-04 9:40 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 11:57 ` Which drive gets read in case of inconsistency? [was: ext3 journal on software raid etc] Michael Tokarev
2005-01-04 12:40 ` Morten Sylvest Olsen
2005-01-04 12:44 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 14:22 ` Maarten [this message]
2005-01-04 14:56 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 14:03 ` ext3 journal on software raid (was Re: PROBLEM: Kernel 2.6.10 crashing repeatedly and hard) David Greaves
2005-01-04 14:07 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 14:43 ` David Greaves
2005-01-04 15:12 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 16:54 ` David Greaves
2005-01-04 17:42 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 19:12 ` David Greaves
2005-01-04 0:45 ` maarten
2005-01-04 10:14 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 13:24 ` Maarten
2005-01-04 14:05 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 15:31 ` Maarten
2005-01-04 16:21 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 20:55 ` maarten
2005-01-04 21:11 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 21:38 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-04 23:29 ` Guy
2005-01-04 19:57 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2005-01-04 21:05 ` maarten
2005-01-04 21:26 ` Alvin Oga
2005-01-04 21:46 ` Guy
2005-01-03 20:22 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-03 23:05 ` Guy
2005-01-04 0:08 ` maarten
2005-01-04 8:57 ` I'm glad I don't live in Spain (was Re: ext3 journal on software raid) David L. Smith-Uchida
2005-01-03 21:36 ` ext3 journal on software raid (was Re: PROBLEM: Kernel 2.6.10 crashing repeatedly and hard) Guy
2005-01-04 0:15 ` maarten
2005-01-04 11:21 ` Michael Tokarev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200501041522.37374.maarten@ultratux.net \
--to=maarten@ultratux.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).