From: maarten <maarten@ultratux.net>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Spares and partitioning huge disks
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:56:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200501090156.18658.maarten@ultratux.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200501082309.j08N9t911087@www.watkins-home.com>
On Sunday 09 January 2005 00:09, Guy wrote:
> Maarten said:
> "Normally, the minute a drive fails, it gets kicked and the spare would
> kick in and md syncs this spare. We now have a non-degraded array again."
>
> Guy says:
> But, you make it seem instantaneously! The array will be degraded until
> the re-sync is done. In my case, that takes about 60 minutes, so 1 extra
> minute is insignificant.
No, sure it is not instantaneous, far from it. Sorry if I made that
impression. On my system it takes a whole lot longer than 60 minutes, more
like 360 minutes. (in my other array where I use whole-disk 160 GB volumes).
> Marrten said:
> "Yes, but this would be impossible to do, since md cannot anticipate
> _which_
> disk you're going to fail before it happens. ;)"
>
> Guy says:
> But, I could tell md which disk I want to spare. After all, I know which
> disk I am going to fail. Maybe even an option to mark a disk as "to be
> failed", which would cause it to be spared before it goes off-line. Then
> md could fail the disk after it has been spared. Neil, add this to the
> wish list! :)
Yes, that would be a smart option indeed :) It gets rid of the window where
any failure would be fatal. But I suppose Neil is overworked as it is.
> EMC does this on their big iron. If the system determines a disk is having
> too many issues (bad blocks or whatever), the system predicts a failure,
> the system copies the disk to a spare. That way a second failure during
> the re-sync would not be fatal. And a direct disk to disk copy is much
> faster (or easier) than a re-build from parity. This is how it was
> explained to me about 5 years ago. No idea if it was marketing lies or
> truth. But I liked the fact that my data stayed redundant while the spare
> was being re-built. This would not work if a drive failed, only if a drive
> failure was predicted. Another cool feature... the disk array then makes a
> support call. The disk is replaced quickly, normally before any redundancy
> was lost.
Hehe. Cool. Big iron -> You indeed get what ya pay for :-))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-09 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-06 14:16 Spares and partitioning huge disks maarten
2005-01-06 16:46 ` Guy
2005-01-06 17:08 ` maarten
2005-01-06 17:31 ` Guy
2005-01-06 18:18 ` maarten
[not found] ` <41DD83DA.9040609@h3c.com>
2005-01-06 19:42 ` maarten
2005-01-07 20:59 ` Mario Holbe
2005-01-07 21:57 ` Guy
2005-01-08 10:22 ` Mario Holbe
2005-01-08 12:19 ` maarten
2005-01-08 16:33 ` Guy
2005-01-08 16:58 ` maarten
2005-01-08 14:52 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2005-01-08 15:50 ` Mario Holbe
2005-01-08 16:32 ` Guy
2005-01-08 17:16 ` maarten
2005-01-08 18:55 ` Guy
2005-01-08 19:25 ` maarten
2005-01-08 20:33 ` Mario Holbe
2005-01-08 23:01 ` maarten
2005-01-09 10:10 ` Mario Holbe
2005-01-09 16:23 ` Guy
2005-01-09 16:36 ` Michael Tokarev
2005-01-09 17:52 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-09 17:59 ` Michael Tokarev
2005-01-09 18:34 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-09 20:28 ` Guy
2005-01-09 20:47 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-10 7:19 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-10 9:05 ` Guy
2005-01-10 9:38 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-10 12:31 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-10 13:19 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-10 18:37 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-11 11:34 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-08 23:09 ` Guy
2005-01-09 0:56 ` maarten [this message]
2005-01-13 2:05 ` Neil Brown
2005-01-13 4:55 ` Guy
2005-01-13 9:27 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-13 15:53 ` Guy
2005-01-13 17:16 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-13 20:40 ` Guy
2005-01-13 23:32 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-14 2:43 ` Guy
2005-01-08 16:49 ` maarten
2005-01-08 19:01 ` maarten
2005-01-10 16:34 ` maarten
2005-01-10 16:36 ` Gordon Henderson
2005-01-10 17:10 ` maarten
2005-01-16 16:19 ` 4 questions. Chieftec chassis case CA-01B, resync times, selecting ide driver module loading, raid5 :2 drives on same ide channel Mitchell Laks
2005-01-16 17:53 ` Gordon Henderson
2005-01-16 18:22 ` Maarten
2005-01-16 19:39 ` Guy
2005-01-16 20:55 ` Maarten
2005-01-16 21:58 ` Guy
2005-01-10 17:13 ` Spares and partitioning huge disks Guy
2005-01-10 17:35 ` hard disk re-locates bad block on read Guy
2005-01-11 14:34 ` Tom Coughlan
2005-01-11 22:43 ` Guy
2005-01-12 13:51 ` Tom Coughlan
2005-01-10 18:24 ` Spares and partitioning huge disks maarten
2005-01-10 20:09 ` Guy
2005-01-10 21:21 ` maarten
2005-01-11 1:04 ` maarten
2005-01-10 18:40 ` maarten
2005-01-10 19:41 ` Guy
2005-01-12 11:41 ` RAID-6 Gordon Henderson
2005-01-13 2:11 ` RAID-6 Neil Brown
2005-01-15 16:12 ` RAID-6 Gordon Henderson
2005-01-17 8:04 ` RAID-6 Turbo Fredriksson
2005-01-11 10:09 ` Spares and partitioning huge disks KELEMEN Peter
2005-01-09 19:33 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2005-01-09 21:26 ` maarten
2005-01-09 22:29 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2005-01-09 23:16 ` maarten
2005-01-10 8:15 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2005-01-14 17:29 ` Dieter Stueken
2005-01-14 17:46 ` maarten
2005-01-14 19:14 ` Derek Piper
2005-01-15 0:13 ` Michael Tokarev
2005-01-15 9:34 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-15 9:54 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2005-01-15 10:31 ` Brad Campbell
2005-01-15 11:10 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2005-01-15 10:33 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-15 11:07 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2005-01-09 23:20 ` Guy
2005-01-10 7:42 ` Gordon Henderson
2005-01-10 9:03 ` Guy
2005-01-10 12:21 ` Stats... [RE: Spares and partitioning huge disks] Gordon Henderson
2005-01-10 0:42 ` Spares and partitioning huge disks Guy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-13 9:53 Bene Martin
2005-01-13 10:11 ` Peter T. Breuer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200501090156.18658.maarten@ultratux.net \
--to=maarten@ultratux.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).