* dd version I used is 5.2.1, but... @ 2005-03-01 19:54 Nicola Fankhauser 2005-03-02 7:45 ` Jurriaan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Nicola Fankhauser @ 2005-03-01 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-raid hi the version of dd I used is 5.2.1 (debian testing), but does anybody have an idea regarding my performance question? regards nicola ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: dd version I used is 5.2.1, but... 2005-03-01 19:54 dd version I used is 5.2.1, but Nicola Fankhauser @ 2005-03-02 7:45 ` Jurriaan 2005-03-02 9:43 ` Nicola Fankhauser 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Jurriaan @ 2005-03-02 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nicola Fankhauser; +Cc: linux-raid From: Nicola Fankhauser <nicola.fankhauser@variant.ch> Date: Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 08:54:25PM +0100 > hi > > the version of dd I used is 5.2.1 (debian testing), but does anybody > have an idea regarding my performance question? > - please group messages in the same thread, thank you. - if there is no answer within a day, wait some more - not everybody is constantly reading this list, you know. - wrt your question: how are those raid-controllers on your motherboard? If they are all connected through a single pci-bus, the speed is reasonable. The best way to test if it's your motherboard or your raid, is to start multiple dd processes on different disks, or multiple bonnie++ processes on different disks, all concurrently, of course. Good luck, Jurriaan -- Never forget: 2 + 2 = 5 for extremely large values of 2. Debian (Unstable) GNU/Linux 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 2x4734 bogomips load 0.71 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: dd version I used is 5.2.1, but... 2005-03-02 7:45 ` Jurriaan @ 2005-03-02 9:43 ` Nicola Fankhauser 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Nicola Fankhauser @ 2005-03-02 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-raid hi Jurriaan wrote: > - please group messages in the same thread, thank you. sorry for that. > - if there is no answer within a day, wait some more - not everybody is > constantly reading this list, you know. thanks for the tip. > - wrt your question: how are those raid-controllers on your motherboard? actually, I could not find very much info about this. all I know is: 1. the SiI 3114 chip is (by specification of the chip, found at SiI's site) connected by a PCI bus, 32bit wide, at 66mhz. however, I don't know whether Asus chose to connect it at 33mhz. lspci says it's 66mhz, but is this information trustworthy? nvidia tech specs of nforce4 sli (the chipset I have) says its PCI bridges are 33mhz only [1]. 2. the nforce4 sata ports are (to my knowledge) directly connected to the nforce4 chipset. > If they are all connected through a single pci-bus, the speed is > reasonable. The best way to test if it's your motherboard or your > raid, is to start multiple dd processes on different disks, or > multiple bonnie++ processes on different disks, all concurrently, of > course. good idea (thought about it too). results of concurrent reads on all eight drives show that the nforce4 sata ports perform quite well at 211MiB/s (52MiB/s per drive), however the SiI 3114 seemed to saturate at 129MiB/s (32MiB/s per drive). added, this gives at total throughput of 340MB/s. non-concurrent dd gives for both controllers values seemingly bound by drive performance of 60MiB/s. thanks & regards nicola [1]: http://nvidia.com/page/pg_20041015917263.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-02 9:43 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-03-01 19:54 dd version I used is 5.2.1, but Nicola Fankhauser 2005-03-02 7:45 ` Jurriaan 2005-03-02 9:43 ` Nicola Fankhauser
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).