From: Harry Mangalam <hjm@tacgi.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3Ware on 64bit Linux.
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:36:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200506100836.20625.hjm@tacgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42A94E91.80009@nsr500.net>
On Friday 10 June 2005 1:25 am, Tim Moore wrote:
> The SD's are 100% duty cycle, 24x7, 1M hour MTBF commercial SATA II drives,
> whereas the JD's are SATA I with a "desktop" rating and a 'designed for
> Microsoft Windows' cert. Why WD would trade a commercial drive for a
> desktop drive?
Dunno, but they did, altho the disks back were 'recertified', not new. As to
the 1M MTBF rating, I also dunno. I got 9 're-certified SD drives' back from
WD and 2 of them (oops, make that 3 of them) have failed in the past 24
hours, which points to some underlying problem in the system. It's on a UPS
which should condition the voltage. The drives that went out were on
different ports and one of them was direct-connected, not via a hotswap cage
(due to previous suspicions about the hotswap cage).
Any insight into this failure rate would be appreciated. About to open
another support call to 3ware...
> Besides that I've used 3Ware controllers since the 6400 and have had zero
> problems with anything.
I guess I'm the reason they say YMMV. :)
> The gui tool is nice but not suited to production
> use.
It sounded like his problem was a one-off change in structure which the gui
was well suited for.
Unless you're going to script it into maint mode, the gui seems to have
benefits.
--
Cheers, Harry
Harry J Mangalam - 949 856 2847 (vox; email for fax) - hjm@tacgi.com
<<plain text preferred>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-10 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-08 17:09 3Ware on 64bit Linux Jason Leach
2005-06-08 18:49 ` Mike Hardy
2005-06-08 18:56 ` Harry Mangalam
2005-06-08 19:58 ` Dan Stromberg
2005-06-08 21:36 ` Konstantin Olchanski
2005-06-08 21:56 ` Harry Mangalam
2005-06-10 8:25 ` Tim Moore
2005-06-10 15:36 ` Harry Mangalam [this message]
2005-06-19 15:57 ` Tim Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200506100836.20625.hjm@tacgi.com \
--to=hjm@tacgi.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).