linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harry Mangalam <hjm@tacgi.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3Ware on 64bit Linux.
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:36:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200506100836.20625.hjm@tacgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42A94E91.80009@nsr500.net>



On Friday 10 June 2005 1:25 am, Tim Moore wrote:

> The SD's are 100% duty cycle, 24x7, 1M hour MTBF commercial SATA II drives,
> whereas the JD's are SATA I with a "desktop" rating and a 'designed for
> Microsoft Windows' cert.  Why WD would trade a commercial drive for a
> desktop drive?

Dunno, but they did, altho the disks back were 'recertified', not new.  As to 
the 1M MTBF rating, I also dunno.  I got 9 're-certified SD drives' back from 
WD and 2 of them (oops, make that 3 of them) have failed in the past 24 
hours, which points to some underlying problem in the system.  It's on a UPS 
which should condition the voltage. The drives that went out were on 
different ports and one of them was direct-connected, not via a hotswap cage 
(due to previous suspicions about the hotswap cage).

Any insight into this failure rate would be appreciated.  About to open 
another support call to 3ware...

> Besides that I've used 3Ware controllers since the 6400 and have had zero
> problems with anything.  

I guess I'm the reason they say YMMV. :)

> The gui tool is nice but not suited to production 
> use.

It sounded like his problem was a one-off change in structure which the gui 
was well suited for. 

Unless you're going to script it into maint mode, the gui seems to have 
benefits.
-- 
Cheers, Harry
Harry J Mangalam - 949 856 2847 (vox; email for fax) - hjm@tacgi.com 
            <<plain text preferred>>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-10 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-08 17:09 3Ware on 64bit Linux Jason Leach
2005-06-08 18:49 ` Mike Hardy
2005-06-08 18:56 ` Harry Mangalam
2005-06-08 19:58   ` Dan Stromberg
2005-06-08 21:36   ` Konstantin Olchanski
2005-06-08 21:56     ` Harry Mangalam
2005-06-10  8:25   ` Tim Moore
2005-06-10 15:36     ` Harry Mangalam [this message]
2005-06-19 15:57       ` Tim Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200506100836.20625.hjm@tacgi.com \
    --to=hjm@tacgi.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).