From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Diego M. Vadell" Subject: Re: sata_nv and RAID1 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:40:54 -0300 Message-ID: <200506131140.54982.dvadell@lantech.com.ar> References: <200506111613.42962.dvadell@lantech.com.ar> <42AD74BD.8050704@tls.msk.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Peter T. Breuer" Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Monday 13 June 2005 09:27, Peter T. Breuer wrote: > I don't know either. For the FR1 code I implemented three new ioctls .. > all of them sent out by the FR1 (raid1) driver. > > 1) notify component that it is in an array and which > 2) notify component that it is no longer in an array and which > 3) send component a callback function through which it can > SET_FAULTY and re-HOTADD itself to the array it kno it is in > as need be. > > Maybe hotplugging has those facilities. I don't know. > > Cooperating devices would have to implement the ioctls. > > Peter Hi Peter, If I understand right, even if I used FR1, it wont pass the test (unplugging the cable). Notice that Im not interested int hotplugging, but in hotUNplugging it as Michael Tokarev said: unplug the cable, linux starts using a degraded mirror, and later I can shutdown the server, plug the disk and let it resync. Thanks, -- Diego.