From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Harry Mangalam Subject: Re: More tales of horror from the linux (HW) raid crypt Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:45:05 -0700 Message-ID: <200506221545.05840.hjm@tacgi.com> References: <5d96567b05061804477325d743@mail.gmail.com> <200506221443.28613.hjm@tacgi.com> <1119477636.5501.161.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1119477636.5501.161.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: mingz@ele.uri.edu Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Also a good point - I was just discussing this in another thread. Areca makes a number of SATA RAID controllers - some are SCSI-SATA, some are PCI-X-SATA, some are PCIe-SATA. Areca supplied this URL to a relatively long review of recent SATA and SCSI controllers - it's worth a read. And surprisingly, the SATA controllers do pretty well against the SCSI controllers. http://www.tweakers.net/reviews/557/1 hjm On Wednesday 22 June 2005 3:00 pm, Ming Zhang wrote: > will this 24 port card itself will be a bottleneck? > > ming > -- Cheers, Harry Harry J Mangalam - 949 856 2847 (vox; email for fax) - hjm@tacgi.com <>