From: Eric Pretorious <eric@pretorious.net>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mike V <mike@asacomputers.com>,
tech@asacomputers.com, Dinesh <dinesh@asacomputers.com>
Subject: Re: linux-raid compatable w/ Adaptec AIC-7902?
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:08:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200506291808.54549.eric@pretorious.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200506291738.30516.eric@pretorious.net>
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 05:38 pm, Eric Pretorious wrote:
>So it would appear that sda7 has failed. Is that correct?
I was in the process of reading this portion of /var/log/messages...
>SCSI disk error : host 0 channel 0 id 0 lun 0 return code = 10000
>I/O error: dev 08:07, sector 2980224
>raid1: disk failure on sda7, disabling device.
> Operation continuing on 1 devices
>raid1: mirro resync was not fully finished, restarting next time.
>md4: no spare disk to reconstruct array! -- continuing in degraded mode
>md: md_do_sync() got signal ... exiting
> ...
>md: autorun
>md: considering sdb7 ...
>md: adding sdb7 ...
>md: adding sdb7 ...
>md: created md4
>md: bind<sda7,1>
>md: bind<sdb7,2>
>md: running: <sdb7><sda7>
>md: sdb7's event counter: 0000002b
>md: sda7's event counter: 0000002a
>md: superblcokc update time inconsistency -- using the most recent one
>md: freshest: sdb7
>md4: kicking faulty sda7!
>md: unbind<sda7,1>
>md: export rdev(sda7)
>mf: md4: raid array is not clean -- starting background reconstruction
...when the system choked, again. Ug!
I expected that a mirror would be more robust than to bring-down the entire
system when one RAID member fails. Was this assumption incorrect?
--
Eric P.,
Truckee, CA
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-30 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-29 22:38 linux-raid compatable w/ Adaptec AIC-7902? Eric Pretorious
2005-06-29 22:57 ` Eric Pretorious
2005-06-29 23:57 ` Eric Pretorious
2005-06-29 23:55 ` Eric Pretorious
2005-06-30 2:10 ` Guy
2005-06-30 17:14 ` Eric Pretorious
2005-07-04 11:27 ` Turbo Fredriksson
2005-07-07 18:49 ` Eric Pretorious
2005-07-08 0:35 ` Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
2005-07-08 12:40 ` Turbo Fredriksson
2005-07-08 12:52 ` Joshua Baker-LePain
2005-07-08 22:56 ` Mark Hahn
2005-07-08 23:20 ` Tyler
2005-06-30 0:38 ` Eric Pretorious
2005-06-30 1:08 ` Eric Pretorious [this message]
2005-06-30 15:51 ` Dinesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200506291808.54549.eric@pretorious.net \
--to=eric@pretorious.net \
--cc=dinesh@asacomputers.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike@asacomputers.com \
--cc=tech@asacomputers.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).