* md_import_device returned -16 raid1
@ 2005-07-16 22:47 Jim Radford
2005-07-16 23:01 ` Tyler
2005-07-16 23:08 ` Neil Brown
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jim Radford @ 2005-07-16 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Greetings all:
Having a bit of difficulty with raid1, I built the array lastnight with
two new drives, and it built fine but when I rebooted I get the following
error when trying to start the array:
I'm running Mandrake 10.1 kernel 2.6.8.1-12mdk
[root@localhost jradford]# mdadm --version
mdadm - v1.7.0 - 11 August 2004
[root@bengali jradford]# mdadm -A -s
mdadm: failed to add /dev/hdc to /dev/md0: Device or resource busy
mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
The following error message shows up in dmesg:
[root@bengali jradford]# dmesg | grep md:
md: md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27
md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
md: autorun ...
md: ... autorun DONE.
md: md0 stopped.
md: could not lock unknown-block(22,0).
md: md_import_device returned -16
md: bind<hdb>
my /proc/mdstat:
[root@bengali jradford]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
md0 : active raid1 hdb[0]
195360896 blocks [2/1] [U_]
unused devices: <none>
Some drive specific information
[root@bengali jradford]# mdadm -E /dev/hdb
/dev/hdb:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.90.00
UUID : 9d09bd52:e44dc514:4e6b732f:5263e2f8
Creation Time : Fri Jul 15 21:16:18 2005
Raid Level : raid1
Device Size : 195360896 (186.31 GiB 200.05 GB)
Raid Devices : 2
Total Devices : 2
Preferred Minor : 0
Update Time : Sat Jul 16 07:33:32 2005
State : clean
Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Checksum : 5ca8741a - correct
Events : 0.326
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
this 0 3 64 0 active sync /dev/hdb
0 0 3 64 0 active sync /dev/hdb
1 1 22 0 1 active sync /dev/hdc
[root@localhost jradford]# mdadm -E /dev/hdc
/dev/hdc:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.90.00
UUID : 9d09bd52:e44dc514:4e6b732f:5263e2f8
Creation Time : Fri Jul 15 21:16:18 2005
Raid Level : raid1
Device Size : 195360896 (186.31 GiB 200.05 GB)
Raid Devices : 2
Total Devices : 2
Preferred Minor : 0
Update Time : Sat Jul 16 07:33:32 2005
State : clean
Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Checksum : 5ca873ef - correct
Events : 0.326
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
this 1 22 0 1 active sync /dev/hdc
0 0 3 64 0 active sync /dev/hdb
1 1 22 0 1 active sync /dev/hdc
And for the md status:
[root@bengali mdadm-2.0-devel-2]# mdadm -D /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 00.90.01
Creation Time : Fri Jul 15 21:16:18 2005
Raid Level : raid1
Array Size : 195360896 (186.31 GiB 200.05 GB)
Device Size : 195360896 (186.31 GiB 200.05 GB)
Raid Devices : 2
Total Devices : 1
Preferred Minor : 0
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Sat Jul 16 07:33:32 2005
State : clean, degraded
Active Devices : 1
Working Devices : 1
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
UUID : 9d09bd52:e44dc514:4e6b732f:5263e2f8
Events : 0.326
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 3 64 0 active sync /dev/hdb
1 0 0 - removed
If I try and add hdc to the array With version 1.9.0 I get
mdadm: hot add failed for /dev/hdc: Invalid argument
but the same message in dmesg as above.
with 2.0devel2 I get:
mdadm: Cannot open /dev/hdc: Device or resource busy
But also the same message in dmesg as above
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Jim
--
==========================================================================
Jim Radford <jradford@npl.com>
http://www.jimradford.com/
==========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: md_import_device returned -16 raid1
2005-07-16 22:47 md_import_device returned -16 raid1 Jim Radford
@ 2005-07-16 23:01 ` Tyler
2005-07-16 23:08 ` Neil Brown
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Tyler @ 2005-07-16 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Unless the mandrake kernel has backported patches in its kernel sources,
I would suggest trying a newer kernel... current is 2.6.12.2, and just
about 2.6.13.
Tyler.
Jim Radford wrote:
> Greetings all:
>
> Having a bit of difficulty with raid1, I built the array lastnight
> with two new drives, and it built fine but when I rebooted I get the
> following error when trying to start the array:
>
> I'm running Mandrake 10.1 kernel 2.6.8.1-12mdk
>
> [root@localhost jradford]# mdadm --version
> mdadm - v1.7.0 - 11 August 2004
>
> [root@bengali jradford]# mdadm -A -s
> mdadm: failed to add /dev/hdc to /dev/md0: Device or resource busy
> mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
>
> The following error message shows up in dmesg:
>
> [root@bengali jradford]# dmesg | grep md:
> md: md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27
> md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
> md: autorun ...
> md: ... autorun DONE.
> md: md0 stopped.
> md: could not lock unknown-block(22,0).
> md: md_import_device returned -16
> md: bind<hdb>
>
> my /proc/mdstat:
>
> [root@bengali jradford]# cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [raid1]
> md0 : active raid1 hdb[0]
> 195360896 blocks [2/1] [U_]
>
> unused devices: <none>
>
> Some drive specific information
>
> [root@bengali jradford]# mdadm -E /dev/hdb
> /dev/hdb:
> Magic : a92b4efc
> Version : 00.90.00
> UUID : 9d09bd52:e44dc514:4e6b732f:5263e2f8
> Creation Time : Fri Jul 15 21:16:18 2005
> Raid Level : raid1
> Device Size : 195360896 (186.31 GiB 200.05 GB)
> Raid Devices : 2
> Total Devices : 2
> Preferred Minor : 0
>
> Update Time : Sat Jul 16 07:33:32 2005
> State : clean
> Active Devices : 2
> Working Devices : 2
> Failed Devices : 0
> Spare Devices : 0
> Checksum : 5ca8741a - correct
> Events : 0.326
>
>
> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
> this 0 3 64 0 active sync /dev/hdb
>
> 0 0 3 64 0 active sync /dev/hdb
> 1 1 22 0 1 active sync /dev/hdc
>
> [root@localhost jradford]# mdadm -E /dev/hdc
> /dev/hdc:
> Magic : a92b4efc
> Version : 00.90.00
> UUID : 9d09bd52:e44dc514:4e6b732f:5263e2f8
> Creation Time : Fri Jul 15 21:16:18 2005
> Raid Level : raid1
> Device Size : 195360896 (186.31 GiB 200.05 GB)
> Raid Devices : 2
> Total Devices : 2
> Preferred Minor : 0
>
> Update Time : Sat Jul 16 07:33:32 2005
> State : clean
> Active Devices : 2
> Working Devices : 2
> Failed Devices : 0
> Spare Devices : 0
> Checksum : 5ca873ef - correct
> Events : 0.326
>
>
> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
> this 1 22 0 1 active sync /dev/hdc
>
> 0 0 3 64 0 active sync /dev/hdb
> 1 1 22 0 1 active sync /dev/hdc
>
> And for the md status:
>
> [root@bengali mdadm-2.0-devel-2]# mdadm -D /dev/md0
> /dev/md0:
> Version : 00.90.01
> Creation Time : Fri Jul 15 21:16:18 2005
> Raid Level : raid1
> Array Size : 195360896 (186.31 GiB 200.05 GB)
> Device Size : 195360896 (186.31 GiB 200.05 GB)
> Raid Devices : 2
> Total Devices : 1
> Preferred Minor : 0
> Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>
> Update Time : Sat Jul 16 07:33:32 2005
> State : clean, degraded
> Active Devices : 1
> Working Devices : 1
> Failed Devices : 0
> Spare Devices : 0
>
> UUID : 9d09bd52:e44dc514:4e6b732f:5263e2f8
> Events : 0.326
>
> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
> 0 3 64 0 active sync /dev/hdb
> 1 0 0 - removed
>
>
>
> If I try and add hdc to the array With version 1.9.0 I get
> mdadm: hot add failed for /dev/hdc: Invalid argument
> but the same message in dmesg as above.
>
> with 2.0devel2 I get:
> mdadm: Cannot open /dev/hdc: Device or resource busy
> But also the same message in dmesg as above
>
> Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Jim
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: md_import_device returned -16 raid1
2005-07-16 22:47 md_import_device returned -16 raid1 Jim Radford
2005-07-16 23:01 ` Tyler
@ 2005-07-16 23:08 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-16 23:18 ` Jim Radford
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Neil Brown @ 2005-07-16 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jim Radford; +Cc: linux-raid
On Saturday July 16, jradford@npl.com wrote:
> Greetings all:
>
> Having a bit of difficulty with raid1, I built the array lastnight with
> two new drives, and it built fine but when I rebooted I get the following
> error when trying to start the array:
>
> I'm running Mandrake 10.1 kernel 2.6.8.1-12mdk
>
> [root@localhost jradford]# mdadm --version
> mdadm - v1.7.0 - 11 August 2004
>
> [root@bengali jradford]# mdadm -A -s
> mdadm: failed to add /dev/hdc to /dev/md0: Device or resource busy
This is telling you that /dev/hdc is 'busy'.
Maybe a filesystem is mounted of it, or of a partition of it?
Could it already be in use?
NeilBrown
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: md_import_device returned -16 raid1
2005-07-16 23:08 ` Neil Brown
@ 2005-07-16 23:18 ` Jim Radford
2005-07-16 23:32 ` Jim Radford
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jim Radford @ 2005-07-16 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neil Brown; +Cc: linux-raid
I'm not exactly sure what could be making it busy, I don't have it
mounted, and I can't seem to find anything in /proc that shows it is in
use in another way. I can't think of a way to check what might be
causing it to think it is in use. Even during boot before userspace it is
giving the same error.
Thanks for your assistance.
[...]
Bridge firewalling registered
md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
md: autorun ...
md: ... autorun DONE.
[...]
md: md0 stopped.
md: could not bd_claim hdc.
md: md_import_device returned -16
md: bind<hdb>
md: raid1 personality registered as nr 3
raid1: raid set md0 active with 1 out of 2 mirrors
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
[...]
/dev/hda1 on / type ext3 (rw)
none on /proc type proc (rw)
none on /sys type sysfs (rw)
/dev/hda6 on /home type ext3 (rw)
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Saturday July 16, jradford@npl.com wrote:
>> Greetings all:
>>
>> Having a bit of difficulty with raid1, I built the array lastnight with
>> two new drives, and it built fine but when I rebooted I get the following
>> error when trying to start the array:
>>
>> I'm running Mandrake 10.1 kernel 2.6.8.1-12mdk
>>
>> [root@localhost jradford]# mdadm --version
>> mdadm - v1.7.0 - 11 August 2004
>>
>> [root@bengali jradford]# mdadm -A -s
>> mdadm: failed to add /dev/hdc to /dev/md0: Device or resource busy
>
> This is telling you that /dev/hdc is 'busy'.
> Maybe a filesystem is mounted of it, or of a partition of it?
>
> Could it already be in use?
>
> NeilBrown
>
--
==========================================================================
Jim Radford <jradford@npl.com>
http://www.jimradford.com/
==========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: md_import_device returned -16 raid1
2005-07-16 23:18 ` Jim Radford
@ 2005-07-16 23:32 ` Jim Radford
2005-07-18 15:57 ` Luca Berra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jim Radford @ 2005-07-16 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
lvm2 seems to be the cause, I removed all lv/vg/pv's and it started fine.
My guess is I need to change something in the mandrake initscripts (order
wise) to make sure lvm doesn't kick into gear until the raid has started.
Thanks for your thoughts!
Jim
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005, Jim Radford wrote:
> I'm not exactly sure what could be making it busy, I don't have it mounted,
> and I can't seem to find anything in /proc that shows it is in use in another
> way. I can't think of a way to check what might be causing it to think it is
> in use. Even during boot before userspace it is giving the same error.
>
> Thanks for your assistance.
>
> [...]
> Bridge firewalling registered
>> Autodetecting RAID arrays.
>> autorun ...
>> ... autorun DONE.
>
> [...]
>
>> md0 stopped.
>> could not bd_claim hdc.
>> md_import_device returned -16
>> bind<hdb>
>> raid1 personality registered as nr 3
> raid1: raid set md0 active with 1 out of 2 mirrors
> kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
>
> [...]
>
>
> /dev/hda1 on / type ext3 (rw)
> none on /proc type proc (rw)
> none on /sys type sysfs (rw)
> /dev/hda6 on /home type ext3 (rw)
>
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Neil Brown wrote:
>
>> On Saturday July 16, jradford@npl.com wrote:
>>> Greetings all:
>>>
>>> Having a bit of difficulty with raid1, I built the array lastnight with
>>> two new drives, and it built fine but when I rebooted I get the
>>> following
>>> error when trying to start the array:
>>>
>>> I'm running Mandrake 10.1 kernel 2.6.8.1-12mdk
>>>
>>> [root@localhost jradford]# mdadm --version
>>> mdadm - v1.7.0 - 11 August 2004
>>>
>>> [root@bengali jradford]# mdadm -A -s
>>> mdadm: failed to add /dev/hdc to /dev/md0: Device or resource busy
>>
>> This is telling you that /dev/hdc is 'busy'.
>> Maybe a filesystem is mounted of it, or of a partition of it?
>>
>> Could it already be in use?
>>
>> NeilBrown
>>
>
>
--
==========================================================================
Jim Radford <jradford@npl.com>
http://www.jimradford.com/
==========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: md_import_device returned -16 raid1
2005-07-16 23:32 ` Jim Radford
@ 2005-07-18 15:57 ` Luca Berra
2005-07-18 22:12 ` Jim Radford
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Luca Berra @ 2005-07-18 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 04:32:05PM -0700, Jim Radford wrote:
>lvm2 seems to be the cause, I removed all lv/vg/pv's and it started fine.
>My guess is I need to change something in the mandrake initscripts (order
>wise) to make sure lvm doesn't kick into gear until the raid has started.
>
check you have
md_component_detection = 1
in /etc/lvm/lvm.conf, it should be the default.
Regards,
L.
--
Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: md_import_device returned -16 raid1
2005-07-18 15:57 ` Luca Berra
@ 2005-07-18 22:12 ` Jim Radford
2005-07-19 11:05 ` Luca Berra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jim Radford @ 2005-07-18 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Luca Berra wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 04:32:05PM -0700, Jim Radford wrote:
>> lvm2 seems to be the cause, I removed all lv/vg/pv's and it started fine.
>> My guess is I need to change something in the mandrake initscripts (order
>> wise) to make sure lvm doesn't kick into gear until the raid has started.
>>
> check you have
> md_component_detection = 1
>
> in /etc/lvm/lvm.conf, it should be the default.
That is the default, however the way Mandrake does their initscript I had
to move the LVM stuff until after the raid is started to make it work
right. It is working great now.
Jim
--
==========================================================================
Jim Radford <jradford@npl.com>
http://www.jimradford.com/
==========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: md_import_device returned -16 raid1
2005-07-18 22:12 ` Jim Radford
@ 2005-07-19 11:05 ` Luca Berra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Luca Berra @ 2005-07-19 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 03:12:07PM -0700, Jim Radford wrote:
>On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Luca Berra wrote:
>
>>On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 04:32:05PM -0700, Jim Radford wrote:
>>>lvm2 seems to be the cause, I removed all lv/vg/pv's and it started fine.
>>>My guess is I need to change something in the mandrake initscripts (order
>>>wise) to make sure lvm doesn't kick into gear until the raid has started.
>>>
>>check you have
>>md_component_detection = 1
>>
>>in /etc/lvm/lvm.conf, it should be the default.
>
>That is the default, however the way Mandrake does their initscript I had
>to move the LVM stuff until after the raid is started to make it work
>right. It is working great now.
it should not be needed at all. lvms that are part of raids should be
ignored by the first lvm run due to md_component_detection = 1, if this
does not apply to you would you care open a bug at qa.mandriva.com
against LVM, i'll look into it..
L.
--
Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: md_import_device returned -16 raid1
@ 2005-07-16 23:06 Jim Radford
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jim Radford @ 2005-07-16 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
I've got a 2.6.11 kernel which has 0.90.1 instead of 0.90.0 md driver in it,
and the same errors occur. What version of the md driver is in 2.6.12/3?
Thanks
Jim
md: md driver 0.90.1 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005, Tyler wrote:
> Unless the mandrake kernel has backported patches in its kernel sources, I
> would suggest trying a newer kernel... current is 2.6.12.2, and just about
> 2.6.13.
>
> Tyler.
>
> Jim Radford wrote:
>
>> Greetings all:
>>
>> Having a bit of difficulty with raid1, I built the array lastnight with
>> two new drives, and it built fine but when I rebooted I get the following
>> error when trying to start the array:
>>
>> I'm running Mandrake 10.1 kernel 2.6.8.1-12mdk
>>
>> [root@localhost jradford]# mdadm --version
>> mdadm - v1.7.0 - 11 August 2004
>>
>> [root@bengali jradford]# mdadm -A -s
>>> failed to add /dev/hdc to /dev/md0: Device or resource busy
>>> /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
>>
>> The following error message shows up in dmesg:
>>
>> [root@bengali jradford]# dmesg | grep md:
>>> md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27
>>> Autodetecting RAID arrays.
>>> autorun ...
>>> ... autorun DONE.
>>> md0 stopped.
>>> could not lock unknown-block(22,0).
>>> md_import_device returned -16
>>> bind<hdb>
>>
>> my /proc/mdstat:
>>
>> [root@bengali jradford]# cat /proc/mdstat
>> Personalities : [raid1]
>> md0 : active raid1 hdb[0]
>> 195360896 blocks [2/1] [U_]
>>
>> unused devices: <none>
>>
>> Some drive specific information
>>
>> [root@bengali jradford]# mdadm -E /dev/hdb
>> /dev/hdb:
>> Magic : a92b4efc
>> Version : 00.90.00
>> UUID : 9d09bd52:e44dc514:4e6b732f:5263e2f8
>> Creation Time : Fri Jul 15 21:16:18 2005
>> Raid Level : raid1
>> Device Size : 195360896 (186.31 GiB 200.05 GB)
>> Raid Devices : 2
>> Total Devices : 2
>> Preferred Minor : 0
>>
>> Update Time : Sat Jul 16 07:33:32 2005
>> State : clean
>> Active Devices : 2
>> Working Devices : 2
>> Failed Devices : 0
>> Spare Devices : 0
>> Checksum : 5ca8741a - correct
>> Events : 0.326
>>
>>
>> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
>> this 0 3 64 0 active sync /dev/hdb
>>
>> 0 0 3 64 0 active sync /dev/hdb
>> 1 1 22 0 1 active sync /dev/hdc
>>
>> [root@localhost jradford]# mdadm -E /dev/hdc
>> /dev/hdc:
>> Magic : a92b4efc
>> Version : 00.90.00
>> UUID : 9d09bd52:e44dc514:4e6b732f:5263e2f8
>> Creation Time : Fri Jul 15 21:16:18 2005
>> Raid Level : raid1
>> Device Size : 195360896 (186.31 GiB 200.05 GB)
>> Raid Devices : 2
>> Total Devices : 2
>> Preferred Minor : 0
>>
>> Update Time : Sat Jul 16 07:33:32 2005
>> State : clean
>> Active Devices : 2
>> Working Devices : 2
>> Failed Devices : 0
>> Spare Devices : 0
>> Checksum : 5ca873ef - correct
>> Events : 0.326
>>
>>
>> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
>> this 1 22 0 1 active sync /dev/hdc
>>
>> 0 0 3 64 0 active sync /dev/hdb
>> 1 1 22 0 1 active sync /dev/hdc
>>
>> And for the md status:
>>
>> [root@bengali mdadm-2.0-devel-2]# mdadm -D /dev/md0
>> /dev/md0:
>> Version : 00.90.01
>> Creation Time : Fri Jul 15 21:16:18 2005
>> Raid Level : raid1
>> Array Size : 195360896 (186.31 GiB 200.05 GB)
>> Device Size : 195360896 (186.31 GiB 200.05 GB)
>> Raid Devices : 2
>> Total Devices : 1
>> Preferred Minor : 0
>> Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>>
>> Update Time : Sat Jul 16 07:33:32 2005
>> State : clean, degraded
>> Active Devices : 1
>> Working Devices : 1
>> Failed Devices : 0
>> Spare Devices : 0
>>
>> UUID : 9d09bd52:e44dc514:4e6b732f:5263e2f8
>> Events : 0.326
>>
>> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
>> 0 3 64 0 active sync /dev/hdb
>> 1 0 0 - removed
>>
>>
>>
>> If I try and add hdc to the array With version 1.9.0 I get
>> mdadm: hot add failed for /dev/hdc: Invalid argument
>> but the same message in dmesg as above.
>>
>> with 2.0devel2 I get:
>> mdadm: Cannot open /dev/hdc: Device or resource busy
>> But also the same message in dmesg as above
>>
>> Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jim
>
>
--
==========================================================================
Jim Radford <jradford@npl.com>
http://www.jimradford.com/
==========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-07-19 11:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-07-16 22:47 md_import_device returned -16 raid1 Jim Radford
2005-07-16 23:01 ` Tyler
2005-07-16 23:08 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-16 23:18 ` Jim Radford
2005-07-16 23:32 ` Jim Radford
2005-07-18 15:57 ` Luca Berra
2005-07-18 22:12 ` Jim Radford
2005-07-19 11:05 ` Luca Berra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-16 23:06 Jim Radford
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).