Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Al Boldi" <a1426z@gawab.com>
To: 'Gordon Henderson' <gordon@drogon.net>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, 'Jeff Breidenbach' <jeff@jab.org>
Subject: Multiplexed RAID-1 mode
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:06:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200507311907.WAA07886@raad.intranet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0507310955400.3698@lion.drogon.net>

Gordon Henderson wrote: {
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
>
> I just ran a Linux software RAID-1 benchmark with some 500GB SATA 
> drives in NCQ mode, along with a non-RAID control. Details are here 
> for those interested.
>
>       http://www.jab.org/raid-bench/

The results you get are about what I get on various systems - essentially
with RAID-1 you get about the same speed as a single drive will get. 

ns1:/var/tmp# hdparm -tT /dev/md1 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1

/dev/md1:
 Timing cached reads:   4116 MB in  2.00 seconds = 2058.31 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  174 MB in  3.00 seconds =  57.99 MB/sec

/dev/sda1:
 Timing cached reads:   4096 MB in  2.00 seconds = 2048.31 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  176 MB in  3.03 seconds =  58.11 MB/sec

/dev/sdb1:
 Timing cached reads:   4116 MB in  2.00 seconds = 2057.28 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  176 MB in  3.02 seconds =  58.27 MB/sec
}

Multiplexing read/write requests would certainly improve performance ala
RAID-0 (-offset overhead).
During reads the same RAID-0 code (+mirroring offset) could be used.
During writes though, this would imply delayed mirroring.

--
Al



  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-31 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-31  5:04 SATA RAID-1 benchmarks Jeff Breidenbach
2005-07-31  9:31 ` Gordon Henderson
2005-07-31 16:06   ` Al Boldi [this message]
2005-08-01  4:22     ` Multiplexed RAID-1 mode Neil Brown
2005-08-01  6:09       ` Jeff Breidenbach
2005-08-01  6:23         ` Neil Brown
2005-08-01 14:12       ` Al Boldi
2005-07-31 11:58 ` [RAID] SATA RAID-1 benchmarks Julian Cowley
2005-07-31 18:36   ` Jeff Breidenbach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200507311907.WAA07886@raad.intranet \
    --to=a1426z@gawab.com \
    --cc=gordon@drogon.net \
    --cc=jeff@jab.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox