From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: jmerkey <jmerkey@utah-nac.org>
Cc: Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@dwd.de>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Where is the performance bottleneck?
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:32:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050831173219.GI4018@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4315D3EB.4000601@utah-nac.org>
On Wed, Aug 31 2005, jmerkey wrote:
>
> 512 is not enough. It has to be larger. I just tried 512 and it still
> limits the data rates.
Please don't top post.
512 wasn't the point, setting it properly is the point. If you need more
than 512, go ahead. This isn't Holger's problem, though, the reading
would be much faster if it was. If the fusion is using a large queue
depth, increasing nr_requests would likely help the writes (but not to
the extent of where it would suddenly be as fast as it should).
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-31 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-29 18:20 Where is the performance bottleneck? Holger Kiehl
2005-08-29 19:54 ` Mark Hahn
2005-08-30 19:08 ` Holger Kiehl
2005-08-30 23:05 ` Guy
2005-09-28 20:04 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-09-30 4:52 ` Guy
2005-09-30 5:19 ` dean gaudet
2005-10-06 21:15 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-08-29 20:10 ` Al Boldi
2005-08-30 19:18 ` Holger Kiehl
2005-08-31 10:30 ` Al Boldi
2005-08-29 23:09 ` Peter Chubb
[not found] ` <20050829202529.GA32214@midnight.suse.cz>
2005-08-30 20:06 ` Holger Kiehl
2005-08-31 7:11 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-08-31 7:26 ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-31 11:54 ` Holger Kiehl
2005-08-31 12:07 ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-31 13:55 ` Holger Kiehl
2005-08-31 14:24 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2005-08-31 20:56 ` Holger Kiehl
2005-08-31 21:16 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2005-08-31 16:20 ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-31 15:16 ` jmerkey
2005-08-31 16:58 ` Tom Callahan
2005-08-31 15:47 ` jmerkey
2005-08-31 17:11 ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-31 15:59 ` jmerkey
2005-08-31 17:32 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2005-08-31 16:51 ` Holger Kiehl
2005-08-31 17:35 ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-31 19:00 ` Holger Kiehl
2005-08-31 18:06 ` Michael Tokarev
2005-08-31 18:52 ` Ming Zhang
2005-08-31 18:57 ` Ming Zhang
2005-08-31 12:24 ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-31 16:25 ` Holger Kiehl
2005-08-31 17:25 ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-31 21:57 ` Holger Kiehl
2005-09-01 9:12 ` Holger Kiehl
2005-09-02 14:28 ` Al Boldi
2005-08-31 13:38 ` Holger Kiehl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050831173219.GI4018@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=Holger.Kiehl@dwd.de \
--cc=jmerkey@utah-nac.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).