From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Online RAID-5 resizing Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 03:00:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20050922010009.GA8750@uio.no> References: <20050920143346.GA5777@uio.no> <17200.9302.242957.23189@cse.unsw.edu.au> <20050921192326.GA30405@uio.no> <20050922001421.GA2205@uio.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050922001421.GA2205@uio.no> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 02:14:21AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > It seems to survive even under quite heavy load now (but of course, restripe > performance suffers badly when doing heavy stuff on the volume :-) ). Too > soon to say if there are problems still, of course. Nopes, it's still corrupting if I'm doing heavy I/O against it while expanding, even after two more patches of the same type. I haven't seen the uninterruptible sleep problem in this round of tests, but I won't say for sure that it went away either. :-) (Yes, I'm replying to myself _again_ :-) ) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/