* 3-disk RAID1 - only two disks active @ 2005-11-15 13:26 vherva 2005-11-15 23:01 ` Neil Brown 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: vherva @ 2005-11-15 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-raid I had two disks taken off from the three-disk raid set (hda,hdb,hdc - hdc failed by itself, hdb was marked bad with raidsetfaulty). When the new disks were added back to the set (with raidhotadd), only two of them became active and one remained as a hot spare. I there a way to reconfigure all three to become active again? This is kernel 2.4.32-rc1. > cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] read_ahead 1024 sectors md1 : active raid1 hdb1[2] hdc1[1] hda1[0] 102720 blocks [2/2] [UU] md2 : active raid1 hdb2[2] hdc2[1] hda2[0] 1024064 blocks [2/2] [UU] md3 : active raid1 hdb3[2] hdc3[1] hda3[0] 37955648 blocks [2/2] [UU] unused devices: <none> > mdadm --detail /dev/md1 /dev/md1: Version : 00.90.00 Creation Time : Fri May 10 13:42:55 2002 Raid Level : raid1 Array Size : 102720 (100.33 MiB 105.19 MB) Device Size : 102720 (100.33 MiB 105.19 MB) Raid Devices : 2 Total Devices : 3 Preferred Minor : 1 Persistence : Superblock is persistent Update Time : Mon Nov 14 23:17:03 2005 State : active Active Devices : 2 Working Devices : 3 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 1 UUID : d3f91d5b:5587896d:982609b1:c6a3e584 Events : 0.191 Number Major Minor RaidDevice State 0 3 1 0 active sync /dev/hda1 1 22 1 1 active sync /dev/hdc1 2 3 65 2 spare /dev/hdb1 > cat /etc/raidtab raiddev /dev/md3 raid-level 1 nr-raid-disks 3 persistent-superblock 1 nr-spare-disks 0 device /dev/hda3 raid-disk 0 device /dev/hdb3 raid-disk 1 device /dev/hdc3 raid-disk 2 raiddev /dev/md2 raid-level 1 nr-raid-disks 3 persistent-superblock 1 nr-spare-disks 0 device /dev/hda2 raid-disk 0 device /dev/hdb2 raid-disk 1 device /dev/hdc2 raid-disk 2 raiddev /dev/md1 raid-level 1 nr-raid-disks 3 persistent-superblock 1 nr-spare-disks 0 device /dev/hda1 raid-disk 0 device /dev/hdb1 raid-disk 1 device /dev/hdc1 raid-disk 2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 3-disk RAID1 - only two disks active 2005-11-15 13:26 3-disk RAID1 - only two disks active vherva @ 2005-11-15 23:01 ` Neil Brown 2005-11-16 3:23 ` Ville Herva 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Neil Brown @ 2005-11-15 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-raid, vherva On Tuesday November 15, vherva@turing.netspan.fi wrote: > I had two disks taken off from the three-disk raid set (hda,hdb,hdc - hdc > failed by itself, hdb was marked bad with raidsetfaulty). When the new disks > were added back to the set (with raidhotadd), only two of them became active > and one remained as a hot spare. > > I there a way to reconfigure all three to become active again? It looks from the details you gave that it never was a three-disk set. It was only ever two-disk, possibly with a spare. > > This is kernel 2.4.32-rc1. With a recent 2.6 kernel, you could mdadm --grow --raid-disk=3 /dev/md1 but with a 2.4 kernel, the only option is to re-create the array: mdadm --stop /dev/md1 mdadm --create /dev/md1 --level=1 --raid-disks=3 /dev/hda1 /dev/hdc1 missing mdadm /dev/md1 --add /dev/hdb1 NeilBrown ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 3-disk RAID1 - only two disks active 2005-11-15 23:01 ` Neil Brown @ 2005-11-16 3:23 ` Ville Herva 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Ville Herva @ 2005-11-16 3:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Brown; +Cc: linux-raid, Samuli Kärkkäinen On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 10:01:10AM +1100, you [Neil Brown] wrote: > On Tuesday November 15, vherva@turing.netspan.fi wrote: > > I had two disks taken off from the three-disk raid set (hda,hdb,hdc - hdc > > failed by itself, hdb was marked bad with raidsetfaulty). When the new disks > > were added back to the set (with raidhotadd), only two of them became active > > and one remained as a hot spare. > > > > I there a way to reconfigure all three to become active again? > > It looks from the details you gave that it never was a three-disk > set. It was only ever two-disk, possibly with a spare. I can't dig up any hard evidence, but my impression is that it _was_ [UUU] back when I had three disks in it the last time. That was in 2003, though. It was created with the mentioned raidtab and 0.90 raidttools - shouldn't that result into three active disks? Later one disk was removed, and later one broken. Now two have been added back. Anyway, you may well be right, perhaps I misremember and it was 2 active + 1 one spare. > > This is kernel 2.4.32-rc1. > > With a recent 2.6 kernel, you could > mdadm --grow --raid-disk=3 /dev/md1 > but with a 2.4 kernel, the only option is to re-create the array: > > mdadm --stop /dev/md1 > mdadm --create /dev/md1 --level=1 --raid-disks=3 /dev/hda1 /dev/hdc1 missing > mdadm /dev/md1 --add /dev/hdb1 Ok, thanks. One of the md's is rootfs, so I'll have to wait for a reboot to try that. -- v -- v@iki.fi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-16 3:23 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-11-15 13:26 3-disk RAID1 - only two disks active vherva 2005-11-15 23:01 ` Neil Brown 2005-11-16 3:23 ` Ville Herva
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).