From: Mitchell Laks <mlaks@verizon.net>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: multiple Sata SATAII 150, TX4 - how to tell which drive is which? headaches galore!
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 03:36:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200601230336.55220.mlaks@verizon.net> (raw)
Dear Experts,
I wanted to ask for any experience with running raid with SATA drives and
controllers here under linux.
I have been having an interesting time!
I initially tried to use raid1 on my asus A8v motherboard
using a mixture of SATA controllers -
the built in motherboard SATA controller (via vt8237)
as well as a Promise PCI card SATAII 150,
but had problems with the kernel. My drives gave me all sorts of errors while
trying to build the raids and while running mkfs.ext3
and i couldn't get it to work reliably with the any of the current kernels I
tried, including 2.6.15.1 the current stable kernel.
I get countless kernel errors as I mentioned in an earlier post.
Now I have switched to only using the PCI card controllers ( Well, I can put
multiple controllers into the motherboard). So I use only sata_promise and
get rid of sata_via, which conflicts (according to my experience).
Now however, when a drive gives me errors - how can I identify which drive on
which device is failing?
The kernel seems to name things randomly.
This is important when a drive 'fails'. Which drive failed? If I am dealing
with /dev/hda1 /dev/hdb1 /dev/hdc1 /dev/hdd1 on the two ide channels
then I 'know' which is which.
Even crazier (from an accounting point of view) is the following.
if I have 2 of these cards, then the sata_promise driver does not appear to
distinguish "where" (ie: which physical controller port on ___which___ card)
the drives are.
The letters don't skip to show you are on a second controller -even if you
leave blank slots to try to see...
The kernel randomly calls the drives sda sdb sdc sdd sde and they seem to be
anywhere on the physical controllers. It seems to be completely random.
HELP!
I since I run a bunch of raid1's, if I get errors I have a major chore. So I
must stop and reboot countless times doing a binary search using mdadm
-E /dev/sd[ab]1 |grep UU to find the UUID's of the misbehaving drives. Then
look closely at mdadm -E of the 2 final candidates to see which one gave me
these errors.
For instance a new drive failed while I was installing the raid, and testing.
To find the erroring drive I had to reproduce the errors each time by
creating the raids, and running mkfs.ext3 which seems to cause the errors.
What if the errors were more occult????
Each card had 4 controllers - however when I have more than 1 card it can be
even more difficult to identify where we are.
Any experience out there to help me?
Thanks,
Mitchell Laks
next reply other threads:[~2006-01-23 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-23 8:36 Mitchell Laks [this message]
2006-01-23 12:20 ` multiple Sata SATAII 150, TX4 - how to tell which drive is which? headaches galore! PFC
2006-01-23 20:22 ` John Hendrikx
2006-01-23 20:44 ` Shawn Usry
2006-01-23 20:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-01-23 20:53 ` John Hendrikx
2006-01-24 9:54 ` PFC
2006-01-24 14:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-01-23 16:27 ` Shawn Usry
2006-01-23 17:41 ` Shawn Usry
2006-01-24 2:46 ` multiple Sata SATAII 150, TX4 - how to tell which drive is which?headaches galore! Shawn Usry
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-24 6:30 Mitchell Laks
2006-01-24 12:53 ` David Greaves
2006-01-24 16:10 ` Shawn Usry
2006-01-24 17:02 ` David Greaves
2006-01-24 17:12 ` Francois Barre
2006-01-24 17:18 ` Gordon Henderson
2006-01-24 17:21 ` Francois Barre
2006-01-24 17:32 ` Gordon Henderson
2006-01-24 22:56 ` John Hendrikx
2006-01-25 5:51 ` Mattias Wadenstein
2006-01-25 8:33 ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200601230336.55220.mlaks@verizon.net \
--to=mlaks@verizon.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).