From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Smith Subject: Re: NVRAM support Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:54:44 +0000 Message-ID: <20060213115444.GY32687@strugglers.net> References: <43EC5655.1060504@web.de> <20060210124204.GC28676@harddisk-recovery.com> <43ECB4A4.6010005@tmr.com> <20060213092204.GB3209@harddisk-recovery.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uldM6F7H/EkAKP6q" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060213092204.GB3209@harddisk-recovery.nl> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --uldM6F7H/EkAKP6q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:22:04AM +0100, Erik Mouw wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 05:02:02PM -0800, dean gaudet wrote: > > it doesn't seem to make any sense at all to use a non-volatile external= =20 > > memory for swap... swap has no purpose past a power outage. >=20 > No, but it is a very fast swap device. Much faster than a hard drive. Wouldn't the same amount of money be better spent on RAM then? --=20 http://strugglers.net/wiki/Xen_hosting -- A Xen VPS hosting hobby Encrypted mail welcome - keyid 0x604DE5DB --uldM6F7H/EkAKP6q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD8HOEIJm2TL8VSQsRAsxOAJ4zbrriI7SzqYcVkQ4Xd8D1aCfQ9QCggrJ5 XYMu5diXWbo+i8PwQUWxjo8= =+fnn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uldM6F7H/EkAKP6q--