From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: NCQ general question Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 17:05:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20060301160554.GD4816@suse.de> References: <5d96567b0602282304o558fb564jd72784bafdd289f5@mail.gmail.com> <440561CB.30201@yahoo.de> <4405A656.1030602@rtr.ca> <4405C41F.5060504@yahoo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4405C41F.5060504@yahoo.de> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Gentoopower Cc: Mark Lord , "Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)" , Linux RAID Mailing List , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Wed, Mar 01 2006, Gentoopower wrote: > I have two seagates in my box a 160GB 7200.7 and 160GB 7200.9(SATAII > NCQ), using NFORCE4. > I can defintely feel the speed difference between the two drives. Well that can't be because of NCQ, since it isn't active :-) > P.S. Just waiting to see NCQ support for my nforce system in libata:-) Don't hold your breath, it's unlikely to get supported as nvidia wont open the specs. ahci is a really really nice controller, if you want ncq I suggest going with that. sil is probably the next in line for ncq support. -- Jens Axboe