From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kasper Dupont <87385155133026632046@expires.04.sep.2006.kasperd.net> Subject: Re: No syncing after crash. Is this a software raid bug? Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 15:48:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20060303144824.GA15672@hactar.lan> References: <20060301124432.GA3591@hactar.lan> <20060301215641.GA27042@hactar.lan> <20060303073016.GA662@hactar.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060303073016.GA662@hactar.lan> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids > grep -i ^wcache /proc/ide/hd*/settings On the 2.6 system where I see the differences between mirrors I get this result from above command: /proc/ide/hde/settings:wcache 1 0 = 1 rw /proc/ide/hdg/settings:wcache 1 0 = 1 rw On a 2.4 system where I see no differences between mirrors I get this result from above command: /proc/ide/hda/settings:wcache 0 0 = 1 rw /proc/ide/hdc/settings:wcache 0 0 = 1 rw /proc/ide/hde/settings:wcache 0 0 = 1 rw /proc/ide/hdg/settings:wcache 0 0 = 1 rw So how should I interpret this? (A copy of any replies to my email address will be appreciated). --=20 Kasper Dupont -- Rigtige m=E6nd skriver deres egne backupprogrammer #define _(_)"d.%.4s%."_"2s" /* This is my new email address */ char*_=3D"@2kaspner"_()"%03"_("4s%.")"t\n";printf(_+11,_+6,_,6,_+2,_+7,= _+6); - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html