From: Kasper Dupont <55666323303470176297@expires.05.sep.2006.kasperd.net>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: No syncing after crash. Is this a software raid bug?
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 20:50:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060304195032.GA12786@hactar.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060304131609.GA4064@erwin.lan>
> However, since "inconsistent parity information in raid[456] is equal
> to "different mirrors" in raid1, there is no real difference.
There is a major difference. Inconsistent parity information can
eventually lead to corruption in another sector in the stripe.
Assume there are two data disks and one parity disk, and two
different versions of sector A are used. Then after a write you
would end up with:
A B A'+B
on the three disks. This is a problem even if you are never
going to need the data from A again. If the disk holding B dies
it will be reconstructed as (A)+(A'+B), which does not give B
as it should. So after reconstruction sector B is corrupted.
--
Kasper Dupont -- Rigtige mænd skriver deres egne backupprogrammer
#define _(_)"d.%.4s%."_"2s" /* This is my new email address */
char*_="@2kaspner"_()"%03"_("4s%.")"t\n";printf(_+11,_+6,_,6,_+2,_+7,_+6);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-04 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-01 12:44 No syncing after crash. Is this a software raid bug? Kasper Dupont
2006-03-01 13:58 ` Luca Berra
2006-03-01 16:24 ` Mike Hardy
2006-03-01 21:56 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-02 13:48 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03 13:39 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-03 14:30 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03 22:26 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-03 23:01 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-04 9:01 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-04 10:10 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03 7:30 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-03 12:03 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03 12:38 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03 14:48 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-03 15:10 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-04 13:16 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-04 13:38 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-04 19:50 ` Kasper Dupont [this message]
2006-03-07 10:47 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-07 11:18 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-07 12:12 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-10 7:43 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-10 7:49 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-16 7:24 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-16 14:04 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060304195032.GA12786@hactar.lan \
--to=55666323303470176297@expires.05.sep.2006.kasperd.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).