* xfs or ext3?
@ 2006-05-10 13:35 Dexter Filmore
2006-05-10 19:20 ` Nix
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dexter Filmore @ 2006-05-10 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Since xfs is not shrinkable (if this information is not correct anymore, let
me know), I consider ext3.
Do I need to no anything? Will there be a noticable performance impact
(softraid5 on four sata disks, athlon xp2000+/512mb)?
Do I have to provide stride parameter like for ext2?
Dex
--
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d--(+)@ s-:+ a- C+++(++++) UL+>++++ P+>++ L+++>++++ E-- W++ N o? K-
w--(---) !O M+ V- PS++(+) PE(-) Y++ PGP t++(---)@ 5 X+(++) R+(++) tv--(+)@
b++(+++) DI+++ D G++ e* h>++ r%>* y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
http://www.stop1984.com
http://www.againsttcpa.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs or ext3?
2006-05-10 13:35 xfs or ext3? Dexter Filmore
@ 2006-05-10 19:20 ` Nix
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nix @ 2006-05-10 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dexter Filmore; +Cc: linux-raid
On 10 May 2006, Dexter Filmore wrote:
> Do I have to provide stride parameter like for ext2?
Yes, definitely.
--
`On a scale of 1-10, X's "brokenness rating" is 1.1, but that's only
because bringing Windows into the picture rescaled "brokenness" by
a factor of 10.' --- Peter da Silva
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-05-10 19:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-05-10 13:35 xfs or ext3? Dexter Filmore
2006-05-10 19:20 ` Nix
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).