From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
paul.clements@steeleye.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 002 of 8] md/bitmap: Remove bitmap writeback daemon.
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:40:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060512104035.5fee4e66.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1060512060736.8006@suse.de>
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
>
> ./drivers/md/bitmap.c | 115 ++----------------------------------------
hmm. I hope we're not doing any of that filesystem I/O within the context
of submit_bio() or kblockd or anything like that. Looks OK from a quick
scan.
a_ops->commit_write() already ran set_page_dirty(), so you don't need that
in there.
I assume this always works in units of a complete page? It's strange to do
prepare_write() followed immediately by commit_write(). Normally
prepare_write() will do some prereading, but it's smart enough to not do
that if the caller is preparing to write the whole page.
We normally use PAGE_CACHE_SIZE for these things, not PAGE_SIZE. Same diff.
If you have a page and you want to write the whole thing out then there's
really no need to run prepare_write or commit_write at all. Just
initialise the whole page, run set_page_dirty() then write_one_page().
Perhaps it should check that the backing filesystem actually implements
commit_write(), prepare_write(), readpage(), etc. Some might not, and the
user will get taught not to do that via an oops.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-12 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-12 6:07 [PATCH 000 of 8] md/bitmap: Introduction - rework management of bitmap files NeilBrown
2006-05-12 6:07 ` [PATCH 001 of 8] md/bitmap: Fix online removal of file-backed bitmaps NeilBrown
2006-05-12 6:07 ` [PATCH 002 of 8] md/bitmap: Remove bitmap writeback daemon NeilBrown
2006-05-12 17:40 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-05-13 3:14 ` Neil Brown
2006-05-13 6:59 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-12 6:07 ` [PATCH 003 of 8] md/bitmap: Cleaner separation of page attribute handlers in md/bitmap NeilBrown
2006-05-12 6:07 ` [PATCH 004 of 8] md/bitmap: Use set_bit etc for bitmap page attributes NeilBrown
2006-05-12 6:07 ` [PATCH 005 of 8] md/bitmap: Remove unnecessary page reference manipulations from md/bitmap code NeilBrown
2006-05-12 6:07 ` [PATCH 006 of 8] md/bitmap: Remove dead code from md/bitmap NeilBrown
2006-05-12 6:08 ` [PATCH 007 of 8] md/bitmap: Tidy up i_writecount handling in md/bitmap NeilBrown
2006-05-12 6:08 ` [PATCH 008 of 8] md/bitmap: Change md/bitmap file handling to use bmap to file blocks NeilBrown
2006-05-12 17:47 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-13 3:46 ` Neil Brown
2006-05-13 6:59 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-13 15:29 ` Paul Clements
2006-05-13 15:42 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-14 11:15 ` Neil Brown
2006-05-14 11:22 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-15 0:26 ` Neil Brown
2006-05-15 21:04 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-15 23:03 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060512104035.5fee4e66.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=paul.clements@steeleye.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).