From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luca Berra Subject: Re: problems with raid=noautodetect Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:30:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20060530173020.GD4022@percy.comedia.it> References: <4471B188.3060400@umit.at> <17522.15774.526526.244768@cse.unsw.edu.au> <20060526075308.GC8203@percy.comedia.it> <17530.30389.862288.268450@cse.unsw.edu.au> <447C7C80.3080002@tmr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <447C7C80.3080002@tmr.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:10:24PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: >>>2) deprecate the "DEVICE" keyword issuing a warning when it is found in >>>the configuration file >> >>Not sure I'm so keen on that, at least not in the near term. >> >Let's not start warning and depreciating powerful features because they >can be misused... If I wanted someone to make decisions for me I would >be using this software at all. you cut the rest of the mail. i did not propose to deprecate the feature, just the keyword. but, ok, just go on writing DEVICE /dev/sda1 DEVICE /dev/sdb1 ARRAY /dev/md0 devices=/dev/sda1,/dev/sdb1 then come on the list and complain when it stops working. L. -- Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it Communication Media & Services S.r.l. /"\ \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN X AGAINST HTML MAIL / \