From: Niccolo Rigacci <niccolo@rigacci.org>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: New FAQ entry? (was IBM xSeries stop responding during RAID1 reconstruction)
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 18:09:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060621160907.GA20630@rigacci.org> (raw)
Thanks to the several guys in this list, I have solved my problem
and elaborated this, can be a new FAQ entry?
Q: Sometimes when a RAID volume is resyncing, the system seems to
locks-up: every disk activity is blocked until resync is done.
A: This is not strictly related to Linux RAID, this is a problem
related to the Linux kernel and the disk subsytem: in no
circumstances a process should get all the disk resources
preventing others to access them.
You can control the max speed at which RAID reconstruction is
done by setting it, say at 5 Mb/s:
echo 5000 > /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max
This is just a workaround, you have to determine the max speed
that does not lock your system by trial and error and you cannot
predict what will be the disk load in the future when the RAID
will be resyncing for some reason.
Starting from version 2.6, Linux kernel has several choices about
the I/O scheduler to be used. The default is the anticipatory
scheduler, which seems to be sub-optimal on resync high load. If
your kernel has the CFQ scheduler compiled in, use it during
resync.
From the command line you can see which schedulers are supported
and change it on the fly (remember to do it for each RAID disk):
# cat /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler
noop [anticipatory] deadline cfq
# echo cfq > /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler
Otherwise you can recompile your kernel and set CFQ as the
default I/O scheduler (CONFIG_DEFAULT_CFQ=y in Block layer, IO
Schedulers, Default I/O scheduler).
--
Niccolo Rigacci
Firenze - Italy
Iraq, missione di pace: 38475 morti - www.iraqbodycount.net
next reply other threads:[~2006-06-21 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-21 16:09 Niccolo Rigacci [this message]
2006-06-21 17:10 ` New FAQ entry? (was IBM xSeries stop responding during RAID1 reconstruction) David Greaves
2006-06-21 18:51 ` Michael Tokarev
2006-06-22 2:20 ` Mark Hahn
2006-06-22 4:35 ` Gil
2006-06-22 7:11 ` Niccolo Rigacci
2006-06-23 3:14 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060621160907.GA20630@rigacci.org \
--to=niccolo@rigacci.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).