From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Luca Berra <bluca@comedia.it>
Subject: Re: issue with internal bitmaps
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:54:29 +0200
Message-ID: <20060718225429.GB28146@percy.comedia.it>
References: <20060706141207.GC21642@percy.comedia.it> <17581.35762.452409.927246@cse.unsw.edu.au> <44BBDC93.6050603@tmr.com> <44BCE36B.1040500@tmr.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <44BCE36B.1040500@tmr.com>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 09:34:35AM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>Boy, I didn't say that well... what I meant to suggest is that when -E 
>or -X are applied to the array as a whole, would it not be useful to 
>itterate them over all of the components rather than than looking for 
>non-existant data in the array itself?
the question i believe is to distinguish the case where an md device is
a component of another md device...
L.

-- 
Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it
        Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
 /"\
 \ /     ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
  X        AGAINST HTML MAIL
 / \