From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Luca Berra <bluca@comedia.it>
Subject: Re: Can you IMAGE Mirrored OS Drives?
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:05:39 +0200
Message-ID: <20060819070539.GA13491@percy.comedia.it>
References: <44E250CD.5040308@aol.com> <20060816073854.GA7356@percy.comedia.it> <20060819011353.GG6440@boogie.lpds.sztaki.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060819011353.GG6440@boogie.lpds.sztaki.hu>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:13:53AM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
>> but you would have to regenerate the initrd and fight again with lilo :(
>
>Or you can just build a kernel with md built-in and use the kernel-level
>RAID autodetection. In situations like this it is _much_ easier and
>_much_ more robust than all the initrd-based solutions I have seen.

please, can we try not to resurrect again the kernel-level autodetection
flamewar on this list.

L.


-- 
Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it
        Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
 /"\
 \ /     ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
  X        AGAINST HTML MAIL
 / \