From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: md patches in -mm Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:06:03 -0800 Message-ID: <20061215120603.41ff6fed.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20061204203410.6152efec.akpm@osdl.org> <17780.63770.228659.234534@cse.unsw.edu.au> <20061205061623.GA13749@amd64.of.nowhere> <20061205062142.GA14784@amd64.of.nowhere> <20061204224323.2e5d0494.akpm@osdl.org> <20061205105928.GA6482@amd64.of.nowhere> <17782.28505.303064.964551@cse.unsw.edu.au> <20061215192146.GA3616@amd64.of.nowhere> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20061215192146.GA3616@amd64.of.nowhere> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jurriaan Cc: Neil Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:21:46 +0100 thunder7@xs4all.nl wrote: > From: Neil Brown > Date: Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 06:20:57PM +1100 > > i.e. current -mm is good for 2.6.20 (though I have a few other little > > things I'll be sending in soon, they aren't related to the raid6 > > problem). > > > 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 doesn't boot on my box, due to the fact that e2fsck gives > > Buffer I/O error on device /dev/md0, logical block 0 > > and after that 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, at which points it complains it can't > read the superblock. It seems the raid6 problem hasn't gone away > completely, after all. Odd. The only md patch in rc1-mm1 is the truly ancient md-dm-reduce-stack-usage-with-stacked-block-devices.patch Does 2.6.20-rc1 work?