From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: sata badness in 2.6.20-rc1? [Was: Re: md patches in -mm] Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:04:54 +0100 Message-ID: <200612152304.55582.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20061204203410.6152efec.akpm@osdl.org> <20061215133927.a8346372.akpm@osdl.org> <20061215220618.06f1873c@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20061215220618.06f1873c@localhost.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cc: Andrew Morton , Neil Brown , Jurriaan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , Tejun Heo List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Friday, 15 December 2006 23:06, Alan wrote: > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:39:27 -0800 > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:05:52 -0800 > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > Jeff, I shall send all the sata patches which I have at you one single time > > > and I shall then drop the lot. So please don't flub them. > > > > > > I'll then do a rc1-mm2 without them. > > > > hm, this is looking like a lot of work for not much gain. Rafael, are > > you able to do a quick chop and tell us whether these: > > The md one and the long history of reports about parallel I/O causing > problems sounds a lot more like the kmap stuff you were worried about > Andrew. I'd be very intereste dto know if it happens on x86_32 built with > a standard memory split and no highmem.... But my box is a x86_64, so ...