From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: sata badness in 2.6.20-rc1? [Was: Re: md patches in -mm] Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:38:02 +0100 Message-ID: <200612160038.03149.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20061204203410.6152efec.akpm@osdl.org> <200612152322.26375.rjw@sisk.pl> <45832095.9000503@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <45832095.9000503@garzik.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Andrew Morton , Neil Brown , Jurriaan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Alan List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Friday, 15 December 2006 23:24, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, 15 December 2006 22:39, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:05:52 -0800 > >> Andrew Morton wrote: > >> > >>> Jeff, I shall send all the sata patches which I have at you one single time > >>> and I shall then drop the lot. So please don't flub them. > >>> > >>> I'll then do a rc1-mm2 without them. > >> hm, this is looking like a lot of work for not much gain. Rafael, are > >> you able to do a quick chop and tell us whether these: > >> > >> pci-move-pci_vdevice-from-libata-to-core.patch > >> pata_cs5530-suspend-resume-support-tweak.patch > >> ata-fix-platform_device_register_simple-error-check.patch > >> initializer-entry-defined-twice-in-pata_rz1000.patch > >> pata_via-suspend-resume-support-fix.patch > >> sata_nv-add-suspend-resume-support.patch > >> libata-simulate-report-luns-for-atapi-devices.patch > >> user-of-the-jiffies-rounding-patch-ata-subsystem.patch > >> libata-fix-oops-with-sparsemem.patch > >> sata_nv-fix-kfree-ordering-in-remove.patch > >> libata-dont-initialize-sg-in-ata_exec_internal-if-dma_none-take-2.patch > >> pci-quirks-fix-the-festering-mess-that-claims-to-handle-ide-quirks-ide-fix.patch > >> > >> are innocent? > > > > Yes, they are. > > We all really appreciate your patience :) This is good feedback. > > To narrow down some more, does applying 2.6.20-rc1 + the attached patch > work? (ignoring -mm tree altogether) Yes, it does. Greetings, Rafael -- If you don't have the time to read, you don't have the time or the tools to write. - Stephen King