* mdadm: raid1 with ext3 - filesystem size differs?
@ 2007-03-16 3:53 Hanno Meyer-Thurow
2007-03-21 6:32 ` dean gaudet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hanno Meyer-Thurow @ 2007-03-16 3:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Hi all!
Please CC me on answers since I am not subscribed to this list, thanks.
When I try to build a raid1 system with mdadm 2.6.1 the filesystem size
recorded in superblock differs from physical size of device.
System:
ana ~ # uname -a
Linux ana 2.6.20-gentoo-r2 #4 SMP PREEMPT Sat Mar 10 16:25:46 CET 2007 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
ana ~ # mdadm --create /dev/md1 --level=1 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1
mdadm: /dev/sda1 appears to contain an ext2fs file system
size=48152K mtime=Thu Mar 15 17:27:07 2007
mdadm: /dev/sda1 appears to be part of a raid array:
level=raid1 devices=2 ctime=Thu Mar 15 17:25:52 2007
mdadm: /dev/sdb1 appears to contain an ext2fs file system
size=48152K mtime=Thu Mar 15 17:27:07 2007
mdadm: /dev/sdb1 appears to be part of a raid array:
level=raid1 devices=2 ctime=Thu Mar 15 17:25:52 2007
Continue creating array? y
mdadm: array /dev/md1 started.
ana ~ # cat /proc/mdstat
md1 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
48064 blocks [2/2] [UU]
ana ~ # mdadm --misc --detail /dev/md1
/dev/md1:
Version : 00.90.03
Creation Time : Thu Mar 15 17:37:35 2007
Raid Level : raid1
Array Size : 48064 (46.95 MiB 49.22 MB)
Used Dev Size : 48064 (46.95 MiB 49.22 MB)
Raid Devices : 2
Total Devices : 2
Preferred Minor : 1
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Thu Mar 15 17:38:27 2007
State : clean
Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
UUID : cf0478ee:7e60a40e:20a5e204:cc7bc2c9
Events : 0.4
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 1 0 active sync /dev/sda1
1 8 17 1 active sync /dev/sdb1
ana ~ # LC_ALL=C fsck.ext3 /dev/md1
e2fsck 1.39 (29-May-2006)
The filesystem size (according to the superblock) is 48152 blocks
The physical size of the device is 48064 blocks
Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!
Abort<y>? yes
Any ideas what could be wrong? Thank you in advance for help!
Regards,
Hanno
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: mdadm: raid1 with ext3 - filesystem size differs?
2007-03-16 3:53 mdadm: raid1 with ext3 - filesystem size differs? Hanno Meyer-Thurow
@ 2007-03-21 6:32 ` dean gaudet
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: dean gaudet @ 2007-03-21 6:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hanno Meyer-Thurow; +Cc: linux-raid
it looks like you created the filesystem on the component device before
creating the raid.
-dean
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Hanno Meyer-Thurow wrote:
> Hi all!
> Please CC me on answers since I am not subscribed to this list, thanks.
>
> When I try to build a raid1 system with mdadm 2.6.1 the filesystem size
> recorded in superblock differs from physical size of device.
>
> System:
> ana ~ # uname -a
> Linux ana 2.6.20-gentoo-r2 #4 SMP PREEMPT Sat Mar 10 16:25:46 CET 2007 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
>
> ana ~ # mdadm --create /dev/md1 --level=1 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1
> mdadm: /dev/sda1 appears to contain an ext2fs file system
> size=48152K mtime=Thu Mar 15 17:27:07 2007
> mdadm: /dev/sda1 appears to be part of a raid array:
> level=raid1 devices=2 ctime=Thu Mar 15 17:25:52 2007
> mdadm: /dev/sdb1 appears to contain an ext2fs file system
> size=48152K mtime=Thu Mar 15 17:27:07 2007
> mdadm: /dev/sdb1 appears to be part of a raid array:
> level=raid1 devices=2 ctime=Thu Mar 15 17:25:52 2007
> Continue creating array? y
>
> mdadm: array /dev/md1 started.
> ana ~ # cat /proc/mdstat
> md1 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
> 48064 blocks [2/2] [UU]
>
> ana ~ # mdadm --misc --detail /dev/md1
> /dev/md1:
> Version : 00.90.03
> Creation Time : Thu Mar 15 17:37:35 2007
> Raid Level : raid1
> Array Size : 48064 (46.95 MiB 49.22 MB)
> Used Dev Size : 48064 (46.95 MiB 49.22 MB)
> Raid Devices : 2
> Total Devices : 2
> Preferred Minor : 1
> Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>
> Update Time : Thu Mar 15 17:38:27 2007
> State : clean
> Active Devices : 2
> Working Devices : 2
> Failed Devices : 0
> Spare Devices : 0
>
> UUID : cf0478ee:7e60a40e:20a5e204:cc7bc2c9
> Events : 0.4
>
> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
> 0 8 1 0 active sync /dev/sda1
> 1 8 17 1 active sync /dev/sdb1
>
> ana ~ # LC_ALL=C fsck.ext3 /dev/md1
> e2fsck 1.39 (29-May-2006)
> The filesystem size (according to the superblock) is 48152 blocks
> The physical size of the device is 48064 blocks
> Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt!
> Abort<y>? yes
>
>
>
> Any ideas what could be wrong? Thank you in advance for help!
>
>
> Regards,
> Hanno
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-03-21 6:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-03-16 3:53 mdadm: raid1 with ext3 - filesystem size differs? Hanno Meyer-Thurow
2007-03-21 6:32 ` dean gaudet
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).