From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: neilb@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, christopher.leech@intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 11/16] md: use async_tx and raid5_run_ops for raid5 expansion operations
Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 23:20:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070502062011.7066.3182.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070502060949.7066.357.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com>
The parity calculation for an expansion operation is the same as the
calculation performed at the end of a write with the caveat that all blocks
in the stripe are scheduled to be written. An expansion operation is
identified as a stripe with the POSTXOR flag set and the BIODRAIN flag not
set.
The bulk copy operation to the new stripe is handled inline by async_tx.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 6bde174..1966713 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -2538,18 +2538,32 @@ static void handle_stripe5(struct stripe_head *sh)
}
}
- if (expanded && test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state)) {
- /* Need to write out all blocks after computing parity */
- sh->disks = conf->raid_disks;
- sh->pd_idx = stripe_to_pdidx(sh->sector, conf, conf->raid_disks);
- compute_parity5(sh, RECONSTRUCT_WRITE);
+ /* Finish postxor operations initiated by the expansion
+ * process
+ */
+ if (test_bit(STRIPE_OP_POSTXOR, &sh->ops.complete) &&
+ !test_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIODRAIN, &sh->ops.pending)) {
+
+ clear_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state);
+
+ clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_POSTXOR, &sh->ops.pending);
+ clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_POSTXOR, &sh->ops.ack);
+ clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_POSTXOR, &sh->ops.complete);
+
for (i= conf->raid_disks; i--;) {
- set_bit(R5_LOCKED, &sh->dev[i].flags);
- locked++;
set_bit(R5_Wantwrite, &sh->dev[i].flags);
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(STRIPE_OP_IO, &sh->ops.pending))
+ sh->ops.count++;
}
- clear_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state);
- } else if (expanded) {
+ }
+
+ if (expanded && test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state) &&
+ !test_bit(STRIPE_OP_POSTXOR, &sh->ops.pending)) {
+ /* Need to write out all blocks after computing parity */
+ sh->disks = conf->raid_disks;
+ sh->pd_idx = stripe_to_pdidx(sh->sector, conf, conf->raid_disks);
+ locked += handle_write_operations5(sh, 0, 1);
+ } else if (expanded && !test_bit(STRIPE_OP_POSTXOR, &sh->ops.pending)) {
clear_bit(STRIPE_EXPAND_READY, &sh->state);
atomic_dec(&conf->reshape_stripes);
wake_up(&conf->wait_for_overlap);
@@ -2560,6 +2574,7 @@ static void handle_stripe5(struct stripe_head *sh)
/* We have read all the blocks in this stripe and now we need to
* copy some of them into a target stripe for expand.
*/
+ struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx = NULL;
clear_bit(STRIPE_EXPAND_SOURCE, &sh->state);
for (i=0; i< sh->disks; i++)
if (i != sh->pd_idx) {
@@ -2583,9 +2598,12 @@ static void handle_stripe5(struct stripe_head *sh)
release_stripe(sh2);
continue;
}
- memcpy(page_address(sh2->dev[dd_idx].page),
- page_address(sh->dev[i].page),
- STRIPE_SIZE);
+
+ /* place all the copies on one channel */
+ tx = async_memcpy(sh2->dev[dd_idx].page,
+ sh->dev[i].page, 0, 0, STRIPE_SIZE,
+ ASYNC_TX_DEP_ACK, tx, NULL, NULL);
+
set_bit(R5_Expanded, &sh2->dev[dd_idx].flags);
set_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &sh2->dev[dd_idx].flags);
for (j=0; j<conf->raid_disks; j++)
@@ -2597,6 +2615,12 @@ static void handle_stripe5(struct stripe_head *sh)
set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh2->state);
}
release_stripe(sh2);
+
+ /* done submitting copies, wait for them to complete */
+ if (i + 1 >= sh->disks) {
+ async_tx_ack(tx);
+ dma_wait_for_async_tx(tx);
+ }
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-02 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-02 6:14 [PATCH 00/16] raid acceleration and asynchronous offload api for 2.6.22 Dan Williams
2007-05-02 6:15 ` [PATCH 01/16] dmaengine: add base support for the async_tx api Dan Williams
2007-05-02 6:15 ` [PATCH 02/16] dmaengine: move channel management to the client Dan Williams
2007-05-02 6:16 ` [PATCH 03/16] ARM: Add drivers/dma to arch/arm/Kconfig Dan Williams
2007-05-02 6:16 ` [PATCH 04/16] dmaengine: add the async_tx api Dan Williams
2007-05-02 6:17 ` [PATCH 05/16] md: add raid5_run_ops and support routines Dan Williams
2007-05-02 6:17 ` [PATCH 06/16] md: use raid5_run_ops for stripe cache operations Dan Williams
2007-05-02 6:18 ` [PATCH 07/16] md: move write operations to raid5_run_ops Dan Williams
2007-05-02 6:18 ` [PATCH 08/16] md: move raid5 compute block " Dan Williams
2007-05-02 6:19 ` [PATCH 09/16] md: move raid5 parity checks " Dan Williams
2007-05-02 6:19 ` [PATCH 10/16] md: satisfy raid5 read requests via raid5_run_ops Dan Williams
2007-05-02 6:20 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2007-05-02 6:20 ` [PATCH 12/16] md: move raid5 io requests to raid5_run_ops Dan Williams
2007-05-02 6:21 ` [PATCH 13/16] md: remove raid5 compute_block and compute_parity5 Dan Williams
2007-05-02 6:21 ` [PATCH 14/16] dmaengine: driver for the iop32x, iop33x, and iop13xx raid engines Dan Williams
2007-05-02 6:22 ` [PATCH 15/16] iop13xx: Surface the iop13xx adma units to the iop-adma driver Dan Williams
2007-05-02 6:22 ` [PATCH 16/16] iop3xx: Surface the iop3xx DMA and AAU " Dan Williams
2007-05-02 6:55 ` [PATCH 00/16] raid acceleration and asynchronous offload api for 2.6.22 Nick Piggin
2007-05-02 15:45 ` Williams, Dan J
2007-05-02 15:55 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-05-02 16:17 ` Williams, Dan J
2007-05-02 16:19 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-05-02 16:36 ` Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
2007-05-02 16:42 ` Williams, Dan J
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070502062011.7066.3182.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christopher.leech@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).