From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
To: david@lang.hm
Cc: Brendan Conoboy <blc@redhat.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Wakko Warner <wakko@animx.eu.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: limits on raid
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:33:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070618183324.GL10006@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706181111020.12717@asgard.lang.hm>
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:12:45AM -0700, david@lang.hm wrote:
> simple ultra-wide SCSI to a single controller.
Hmm, isn't ultra-wide limited to 40MB/s? Is it Ultra320 wide? That
could do a lot more, and 220MB/s sounds plausable for 320 scsi.
> I didn't realize that the rate reported by /proc/mdstat was the write
> speed that was takeing place, I thought it was the total data rate (reads
> + writes). the next time this message gets changed it would be a good
> thing to clarify this.
Well I suppose itcould make sense to show rate of rebuild which you can
then compare against the total size of tha raid, or you can have rate of
write, which you then compare against the size of the drive being
synced. Certainly I would expect much higer speeds if it was the
overall raid size, while the numbers seem pretty reasonable as a write
speed. 4MB/s would take for ever if it was the overall raid resync
speed. I usually see SATA raid1 resync at 50 to 60MB/s or so, which
matches the read and write speeds of the drives in the raid.
--
Len Sorensen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-18 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-15 2:58 limits on raid david
2007-06-15 3:05 ` Neil Brown
2007-06-15 3:43 ` david
2007-06-15 3:58 ` Neil Brown
2007-06-15 9:13 ` David Chinner
2007-06-15 22:21 ` Neil Brown
2007-06-15 11:10 ` Avi Kivity
2007-06-15 16:23 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-15 17:20 ` Avi Kivity
2007-06-15 21:59 ` Neil Brown
2007-06-16 17:23 ` Avi Kivity
2007-06-17 13:00 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-18 4:57 ` David Chinner
2007-06-21 2:56 ` Neil Brown
2007-06-21 6:39 ` David Chinner
2007-06-21 6:45 ` david
2007-06-21 8:59 ` David Greaves
2007-06-21 17:00 ` Mark Lord
2007-06-21 11:00 ` David Chinner
2007-06-21 12:40 ` Mattias Wadenstein
2007-06-21 14:40 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-21 16:48 ` david
2007-06-21 18:30 ` Martin K. Petersen
2007-06-21 20:08 ` Nix
2007-06-16 2:03 ` Wakko Warner
2007-06-16 3:47 ` Neil Brown
2007-06-16 4:40 ` Dan Merillat
2007-06-16 7:48 ` david
2007-06-16 13:38 ` David Greaves
2007-06-16 17:16 ` david
2007-06-17 17:16 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-06-18 17:20 ` Brendan Conoboy
2007-06-18 17:28 ` david
2007-06-18 18:03 ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-06-18 18:12 ` david
2007-06-18 18:33 ` Lennart Sorensen [this message]
2007-06-18 18:40 ` david
2007-06-18 19:11 ` Brendan Conoboy
2007-06-18 20:52 ` david
2007-06-18 21:46 ` Wakko Warner
2007-06-18 21:56 ` david
2007-06-18 22:00 ` Brendan Conoboy
2007-06-19 20:11 ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-06-19 20:51 ` david
2007-06-19 15:07 ` Phillip Susi
2007-06-19 19:28 ` david
2007-06-18 18:07 ` Brendan Conoboy
2007-06-18 18:16 ` david
2007-06-16 13:33 ` David Greaves
2007-06-17 1:44 ` dean gaudet
2007-06-21 3:01 ` Neil Brown
2007-06-21 8:49 ` David Greaves
2007-06-16 14:08 ` Wakko Warner
2007-06-17 1:47 ` dean gaudet
2007-06-17 13:28 ` Wakko Warner
2007-06-17 17:28 ` dean gaudet
2007-06-17 19:30 ` Wakko Warner
2007-06-17 19:54 ` dean gaudet
2007-06-17 20:46 ` david
2007-06-17 20:44 ` david
2007-06-17 17:14 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-06-21 23:03 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-06-22 2:24 ` Neil Brown
2007-06-22 8:10 ` David Greaves
2007-06-22 9:51 ` david
2007-06-22 12:39 ` David Greaves
2007-06-22 16:00 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-06-22 16:55 ` David Greaves
2007-06-22 18:41 ` david
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070618183324.GL10006@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
--to=lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
--cc=blc@redhat.com \
--cc=david@lang.hm \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=wakko@animx.eu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).