From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>
Cc: "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@ieee.org>,
Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@duke.edu>, David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>,
Jon Collette <jon@etelos.com>,
linux-ide-arrays@lists.math.uh.edu, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Advocacy] Re: 3ware 9650 tips
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:48:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070716174801.GM13826@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200707162040.00062.a1426z@gawab.com>
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 08:40:00PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
> XFS surely rocks, but it's missing one critical component: data=ordered
> And that's one component that's just too critical to overlook for an
> enterprise environment that is built on data-integrity over performance.
>
> So that's the secret why people still use ext3, and XFS' reliance on external
> hardware to ensure integrity is really misplaced.
>
> Now, maybe when we get the data=ordered onto the VFS level, then maybe XFS
> may become viable for the enterprise, and ext3 may cease to be KING.
Wow, thanks for bringing an advocacy thread onto linux-fsdevel. Just what
we wanted. Do you have any insight into how to "get the data=ordered
onto the VFS level"? Because to me, that sounds like pure nonsense.
--
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-16 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <alpine.LRH.0.999.0707131356520.25773@chaos.egr.duke.edu>
2007-07-13 18:35 ` 3ware 9650 tips Justin Piszcz
2007-07-13 18:54 ` Jon Collette
2007-07-13 19:36 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-07-16 2:41 ` David Chinner
2007-07-16 12:22 ` David Chinner
2007-07-16 12:39 ` Bernd Schubert
2007-07-16 15:50 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-07-16 22:21 ` David Chinner
2007-07-16 15:43 ` Joshua Baker-LePain
2007-07-16 17:15 ` [Advocacy] " Bryan J. Smith
2007-07-16 17:40 ` Al Boldi
2007-07-16 17:48 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2007-07-16 18:28 ` [RFC] VFS: data=ordered (was: [Advocacy] Re: 3ware 9650 tips) Al Boldi
2007-07-16 19:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-07-16 18:38 ` [Advocacy] Re: 3ware 9650 tips Bryan J. Smith
2007-07-16 17:34 ` Stuart Levy
2007-07-13 19:04 ` Joshua Baker-LePain
2007-07-13 23:30 ` Michael Tokarev
2007-07-14 1:23 ` Andrew Klaassen
2007-07-14 8:08 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-07-14 16:10 ` Andrew Klaassen
2007-07-14 16:11 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-07-14 16:14 ` Andrew Klaassen
2007-07-14 16:18 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-07-14 9:04 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2007-07-14 16:11 ` Andrew Klaassen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070716174801.GM13826@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=a1426z@gawab.com \
--cc=b.j.smith@ieee.org \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=jlb17@duke.edu \
--cc=jon@etelos.com \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide-arrays@lists.math.uh.edu \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).