From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: martin f krafft Subject: Re: mdadm 2.6.3 segfaults on assembly (v1 superblocks) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 12:37:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20070930113716.GB8924@lapse.madduck.net> References: <20070907080901.GA16012@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net> <18167.15596.666216.853865@notabene.brown> Reply-To: 444682@bugs.debian.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18167.15596.666216.853865@notabene.brown> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Neil Brown Cc: linux-raid mailing list List-Id: linux-raid.ids --bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable also sprach Neil Brown [2007.09.24.0528 +0100]: > Sure could. Thanks for the report. >=20 > This patch (already in .git) should fix it. Apparently it does not, and it seems to be amd64-only since I saw it on amd64 and a bunch of people reported success on i386: http://bugs.debian.org/444682 Any help appreciated. I don't have an amd64 system around for another three weeks... --=20 martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck =20 scientists will study your brain to learn more about your distant cousin, man. =20 spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net --bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="digital_signature_gpg.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/) Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG/4psIgvIgzMMSnURAu82AKDIBTG8vclLeZVSqgFwkUSl6VHz/wCgkT37 4mkWpfOzFeIRq7AazTJvMFI= =jfmH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE--