From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Clayton <andrew@digital-domain.net>
Subject: Re: RAID 5 performance issue.
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 21:10:03 +0100
Message-ID: <20071003211003.37130cc8@alpha.digital-domain.net>
References: <20071003105321.06943824@zeus.pccl.info>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0710031243080.8612@p34.internal.lan>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0710031248020.8612@p34.internal.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710031248020.8612@p34.internal.lan>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: Andrew Clayton <andrew@pccl.info>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:48:27 -0400 (EDT), Justin Piszcz wrote:

> Also if it is software raid, when you make the XFS filesyste, on it,
> it sets up a proper (and tuned) sunit/swidth, so why would you want
> to change that?

Oh I didn't, the sunit and swidth were set automatically. Do they look
sane?. From reading the XFS section of the mount man page, I'm not
entirely sure what they specify and certainly wouldn't have any idea
what to set them to.

> Justin.

Cheers,

Andrew