linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Clayton <andrew@digital-domain.net>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: Andrew Clayton <andrew@pccl.info>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID 5 performance issue.
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 21:19:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071003211910.439ded54@alpha.digital-domain.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710031243080.8612@p34.internal.lan>

On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:43:24 -0400 (EDT), Justin Piszcz wrote:

> Have you checked fragmentation?

You know, that never even occurred to me. I've gotten into the mind set
that it's generally not a problem under Linux.

> xfs_db -c frag -f /dev/md3
> 
> What does this report?

# xfs_db -c frag -f /dev/md0
actual 1828276, ideal 1708782, fragmentation factor 6.54%

Good or bad? 

Seeing as this filesystem will be three years old in December, that
doesn't seem overly bad.


I'm currently looking to things like

http://lwn.net/Articles/249450/ and 
http://lwn.net/Articles/242559/

for potential help, fortunately it seems I won't have too long to wait.

> Justin.

Cheers,

Andrew

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-10-03 20:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-03  9:53 RAID 5 performance issue Andrew Clayton
2007-10-03 16:43 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-03 16:48   ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-03 20:10     ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-03 20:16       ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-06 12:30       ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-06 16:05         ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-03 20:19   ` Andrew Clayton [this message]
2007-10-03 20:35     ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-03 20:46       ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-03 20:36     ` David Rees
2007-10-03 20:48       ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-04 14:08       ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-04 14:09         ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-04 14:10           ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-04 14:44             ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-04 16:20               ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-04 18:26                 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-05 10:25                   ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-05 10:57                     ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-05 11:08                       ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-05 12:53                         ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-05 13:18                           ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-05 13:30                           ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-05 14:07                             ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-05 14:32                               ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-05 16:10                               ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-05 16:16                                 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-05 19:33                                   ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-05 18:58                                 ` Richard Scobie
2007-10-05 19:02                                   ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-05 19:02               ` John Stoffel
2007-10-05 19:42                 ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-05 20:56                   ` John Stoffel
2007-10-07 17:22                     ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-11 17:06                       ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-11 18:07                         ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-11 23:43                           ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-04 14:36           ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-04 14:39             ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-04 15:03               ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-04 16:19                 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-04 19:01                   ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-04 16:46                 ` Steve Cousins
2007-10-04 17:06                   ` Steve Cousins
2007-10-04 19:06                   ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-05 10:20                     ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-04 14:39             ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-03 17:53 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2007-10-03 20:20   ` Andrew Clayton
2007-10-03 20:48     ` Richard Scobie
2007-10-05 20:25 ` Brendan Conoboy
2007-10-06  0:38   ` Dean S. Messing
2007-10-06  8:18     ` Justin Piszcz
2007-10-08  1:40       ` Dean S. Messing
2007-10-08  8:44         ` Justin Piszcz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071003211910.439ded54@alpha.digital-domain.net \
    --to=andrew@digital-domain.net \
    --cc=andrew@pccl.info \
    --cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).